Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every DNForum feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

Why not malicious prosecution?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ovicide

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
I've often wondered why this doesn't happen more often. Here's a sample situation:

1. Someone in the U.S. registers a generic name, "example.com" and points it at a For Sale page, asking several million dollars.

2. A wealthy U.S. corporation want's the name.
a) They can make a weak claim for trademark infringement.
b) They do not believe they can win a UDRP.
c) They do not believe they can win a trademark infringement suit.
d) They do not want to pay the asking price of several million dollars.

3. They sue the person who has registered the name, knowing he cannot afford to defend the suit.

4. The domain name holder gives them the name, rather than defend a law suit that he may win.

Do companies to this to people?
What's to prevent them?
 

HOWARD

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Messages
223
Reaction score
0
There is a Rule in U. S. Federal Court that provides for sanctions against Plaintiffs and their attorneys who may file "sham" pleadings that they know cannot succeed. The Defendant, if he can prove that they are simply trying to force him into giving up a domain, can recover attorneys fees, costs and additional moneys for being falsely dragged into court. CAVEAT: If there is ANY evidence that there may be some truth in the pleadings, the Court can rule in favor of the big money Plaintiff.
 

Ovicide

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
jberryhill said:
www.johnberryhill.com/cello

The sanctions have been reversed on appeal, but the decision on the merits remains unchanged.

In this case, Mr. Storey stood his ground, but a lot of people wouldn't be able to afford to defend themselves.

It looks like a good strategy for getting a good name cheaply, if the person holding the name is in the U.S.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 3) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

Premium Members

Upcoming events

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom