WTF? : Intellectual Dishonesty :: Disrespectful To Members

[DN BROKER]

never mind

 

[Rockefeller]

link?

 

[DN BROKER]

never mind

 

[A D]

He disagreed with a post I made and I have spoken to him directly on the phone.

Adam

 

[DN BROKER]

never mind

 

[Biggie]

Shameful, he has no right to use your name like that. Please involved a lawyer and sue his @SS

lol


he had/has as much right as Adam, we he created a thread here and named names.


the "respect or lack of it" is due to deleted threads and posts of other "respected" members here, in an effort to show "new found respect" for others.


know the whole story, first

 

[DN BROKER]

never mind

 

[A D]

he had/has as much right as Adam, we he created a thread here and named names.


the "respect or lack of it" is due to deleted threads and posts of other "respected" members here, in an effort to show "new found respect" for others.


know the whole story, first

Here's where your're wrong biggy, Dnforum is a private company that can delete any posts or threads I feel like.
Bloggers cannot slander or libel people.

Check with a lawyer, I know I already did.

I assure you soon a precedent will be set in the industry.

Adam

 

[DN BROKER]

never mind

 

[Biggie]

Here's where your're wrong biggy, Dnforum is a private company that can delete any posts or threads I feel like.
Bloggers cannot slander or libel people.

Check with a lawyer, I know I already did.

I assure you soon a precedent will be set in the industry.

Adam

even with your right to delete threads of evidence,

your actions were the direct result of the feelings expressed by those who posted on that blog



thus if anyone concurred with the context of the article, there must have been some substance to it.



sure you have the contacts and the finances to litigate and intimidate, but in the end....it was your original comments that kicked it off.



i just think it's not right to kick one group to the curb, just to show support for another


are you gonna kick them to the curb later, when you wanna give someone else new found respect?



it's only the "principle" of that, which i'm talking about


but if that's how you roll, then now i know

 

[A D]

Thus if anyone concurred with the context of the article, there must have been some substance to it.

>>> Just because some agree with a blog post does not make it round or are we to beleive their are aliens because some have seen them.

sure you have the contacts and the finances to litigate and intimidate, but in the end....it was your original comments that kicked it off.

>>> It's not about finances or intimidation, It's staying within the law.

i just think it's not right to kick one group to the curb, just to show support for another

>>> Nobody got kicked to the curb actually quite the opposite, I apologized to those effected.

but if that's how you roll, then now i know

>>> Here's what I know, Let's call a spade a spade, most of your posts since you were a dethroned dictator here are negative.

You are not adding much value to threads with your negative comments.

-=DCG=-

 

[Gerry]

Title jumps out as having read too much of Santus Domainus' posts.

People here use these cute little catch words that someone else used and they then use them over and over to the point of nauseating. Are they trying to get people to believe that they came up with that cute little catch phrase? BS, it is. Too much influence from the groups' idols at F-O-X.

Example: how many of you are aware of the word Flummoxed? About 3 days ago when some woman on the street was interviewed about her view of the impasse...she used that word on camera. Since then I am seeing it in print, on TV interviews and hearing it on the radio. It's like the thing has lived its' 15 minutes of fame. Now let it die back into the dusty annals of vocabulary where it was.

---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:55 PM ----------

I assure you soon a precedent will be set in the industry.

Hmm...

 

[Biggie]

>>> Here's what I know, Let's call a spade a spade, most of your posts since you were a dethroned dictator here are negative.

You are not adding much value to threads with your negative comments.

-=DCG=-

you're funny

you let that cure cancer dude disrepect folks on the regular, get banned and come back with a negative thread.....then when i don't agree with him...i'm negative

he started this thread and i responded


and how can i dictate something i don't own?

i'm gone as mod, but members still complain about threads/posts being closed/deleted....so what's changed?

nothing but you!


but i like that you wanna call a spade a spade


free your mind, get it all out


because i don't go with the flow and speak my own mind, it's negative


i'd rather have 10000 mf's who have the courage to disagree with me or at least challenge my opinion, than 100 ass kissers who will agree with what i say because of who they think i am.... in their own minds.


sure on dnf, you have the power to paint me a spade or any card in the deck, if i ain't shuffling to your beat.

i march to the beat of my own drum!

but if all you've seen is negativity, then you haven't bee-ing see-ing clearly


maybe time for dcg to come back to earth


imo...

 

[companyone]

Hi " Cure Cancer".

I do know the story as I was following the thread and also posted in it myself. Using Adam's name in a blog's title with those words is wrong that is my argument. Calling Adam names is shameful and not needed, then attacking his new site dnf college is also shameful. Obviously this blogger is the guilty one by posting Adam's respectful name on the internet to be indexed so his pathetic blog gets traffic. It's a shame that individuals like him take one incident and turn the table against Adam, not only has Adam provided a safe community for us to buy, trade, sell, develop, chat, argue, debate with one another but also taken time out of his busy schedule time after time to help/support our community when ever he could. I can post a million things that Adam has done for us and here we have one blogger who shamefully misleads the world wide web users in labeling Adam's name with dishonesty. Shame on anyone who would take this issue to that level.

First off, I did not "label' Adam a being a dishonest person in the sense that he is a dishonest person with anything AT ALL..with regards to his business dealings or personal life or anything else. Adam has always been a very honest person and fair person... as far as I know in these regard's. And I never called this into question at all....but yet, this is what your trying to imply in your comment, which IMHO, is "disingenuous" and misleading...on your part.

You conveniently left off the word "Intellectually", before the word ' dishonesty' in your comment...which is very much skews the meaning of what I posted. And this certainly did not mean that Adam is a Intellectually Dishonest as a person ( as I do not believe that to be true) , as I made perfectly clear in my blog post.... this post was about only one 'specific subject matter', and one ONLY! The discussion thread that was deleted.

Second:

" chat, argue, debate with one another".

...that is what i thought we were doing in the thread that was deleted...was it not?

Third:

Calling Adam names is shameful and not needed, then attacking his new site dnf college is also shameful

I did not call Adam names, and as for Adams "dnf college"... I am signed up for it, and this is what is stated by me in the comments section of said blog post.

July 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM In the comments thread of the my blog post that is being discussed.

"I think “Adam” is well on his way with his new “DN college”… it is a very well thought out program, and I think it will be very successful. I am wishing now I was in it…and this is not exactly my first day…learning about domains"

I also stated in my my blog posting that, "I hope it worked out well for all involved." (that was NOT a 'sarcastic' remark.)

Forth:

Obviously this blogger is the guilty one by posting Adam's respectful name on the internet to be indexed so his pathetic blog gets traffic.

This is 100% false, my post had nothing to do with any aspect of this comment by you. Besides that, it is just nonsense speculation by you...with no bases in fact.

Regards,
Dan

BTW: As Adam stated in his post above, we spoke on the phone for 10-15 minutes, and had a very good chat, and clarified anything that needed to be clarified from his perspective and mine. End of story.

 

[Gerry]

Hi " Cure Cancer".


First off, I did not "label' Adam a being a dishonest person in the sense that he is a dishonest person with anything AT ALL..with regards to his business dealings or personal life or anything else. Adam has always been a very honest person and fair person... as far as I know in these regard's. And I never called this into question at all....but yet, this is what your trying to imply in your comment, which IMHO, is "disingenuous" and misleading...on your part.

You conveniently left off the word "Intellectually", before the word ' dishonesty' in your comment...which is very much skews the meaning of what I posted. And this certainly did not mean that Adam is a Intellectually Dishonest as a person ( as I do not believe that to be true) , as I made perfectly clear in my blog post.... this post was about only one 'specific subject matter', and one ONLY! The discussion thread that was deleted.

Second:
...that is what i thought we were doing in the thread that was deleted...was it not?

Third:



I did not call Adam names, and as for Adams "dnf college"... I am signed up for it, and this is what is stated by me in the comments section of said blog post.



I also stated in my my blog posting that, "I hope it worked out well for all involved." (that was NOT a 'sarcastic' remark.)

Forth:



This is 100% false, my post had nothing to do with any aspect of this comment by you. Besides that, it is just nonsense speculation by you...with no bases in fact.

Regards,
Dan

BTW: As Adam stated in his post above, we spoke on the phone for 10-15 minutes, and had a very good chat, and clarified anything that needed to be clarified from his perspective and mine. End of story.

WHOA! Can you post a link to the referenced blog (blogger)?

In typical fashion, appears to be a grandiose dose of hyperbole from the OP...

 

[DN BROKER]

never mind

 

[stock_post]

.

 

[Raider]

How you doing Dan? you know how much I like reading your posts.. I was not aware you had a blog, can you please post it OR send it by PM?

Thanks!

---------- Post added 07-30-2011 at 12:14 AM ---------- Previous post was 07-29-2011 at 11:46 PM ----------

Not sure what your point is by coming here and posting your argument, your intention is very clear by posting Adam's name in the title and not to mention the amount of bs you have posted, if you had any respect for Adam you would have contacted him in private. So don't give me that bull shit that I'm squeezing your words around.

I don't believe it... What your saying is completely out of his character. Criticizing someone is not always insulting or attacking someone. I don't know the facts here, but everyone has the right to post and express their opinion, that includes OUTSIDE the forum so long as its' NOT personal, and I trust that it's NOT.

 

[DN BROKER]

never mind

 

[Raider]

It's personal when you post in your title ADAM DICKER - wtf do you call that?

"Personal" as in personally attacking someone. You of course knew what I meant.

I admire your loyalty, but your dead wrong here MIR..... I just finished reading that entire piece by Dan and it confirmed what I already thought, Dan was respectful as he always is, I honestly wish I was more like him, He has the patience and understanding of a saint.

Just because you didn't like the article does NOT mean it was a character attack against Adam .. Try to think outside the box will you?

Why do you feel it's OK for Adam to criticize bloggers but not OK for bloggers to criticize Adam, for criticizing bloggers?.. That's just not the way it "rolls", life is a two way street.

People here use these cute little catch words that someone else used and they then use them over and over to the point of nauseating. Are they trying to get people to believe that they came up with that cute little catch phrase? BS, it is. Too much influence from the groups' idols at F-O-X.

And this coming from someone who claims he hates F-O-X and never watches. I'll bet if his Dogs could talk they'd sound like Bill Oreilly.