You know what @DomainsGENERAL.com meant @amplify.
No, I actually don't know what he means by this except the literal definitions of the phrases he used. If he walked into a debate and said this,
Because you're running a kind of Ponzi scheme and you're after churn and volume.
My rebuttal would be the same.
His rebuttal would be, "Come on, you know what I meant."
However, in a debate, I don't know what you meant except what you actually said.
Are you going to walk that back now and reword it? Anyone for or against Epik's success, and able to look at things objectively, can see that it's neither (a) a Ponzi scheme (or "like") or (b) a cash grab, unless cash grab refers to profits, which all companies (public and private) do on a daily basis.
What else am I supposed to infer from his statement except his actual literal words used?
You're lucky they don't serve you for libel and force you to walk it back in a written formal apology, or they take it to trial. You stated two things that people would take at face value, on a public forum, with the sole intention of damaging a company's reputation, a company you know nothing about (Epik LLC) and can only insinuate actions they will take moving forward.
It was unintelligent to be politically correct, but I'm not that: It was plain retarded to put those adjective clauses in one sentence in reference to Epik.
It's not like if Epik also proposed "lifetime" registrations. What will happen to these people, btw? Will Epik LLC honor the "lifetime" renewals? Or were these engagements conveniently left at the "old Epik" and won't be honored anymore?
They should. Do you know how accounting works and how to manage books? They took on their accounts and debt in the deal, or should have. And, lifetime registration is moot in the whole scheme of things if money is managed correctly.
Let me give you a quick rundown on how lifetime registration could bolster a company, allowing them to get more in financing, and not putting that money at risk.
What was it, $500 or $1000 for forever registration? Either way, it wasn't popular with domainers, we know that much. How many do you think have forever registration? I think
@accurate mentioned that he had one, so if anything, he should be asking the question, and not here, to customer service before posting any nonsense.
Anyway, let me assume it's $500 for lifetime registration. You could take $90 and apply it for 10-years and still have $410 left over. Do you know how much $410 earns per month in a passive fund? Upwards of $41 per year. So, it's accruing $41 (growing both in principal as the markets rise as well as dividends as the percentage stays constant) in interest per year over the 10-year period. By the time they need to renew it again for 10 more years, there is already $410 in an account plus, let's say, around $500 extra in dividends. Now, let's just assume over the 10-year period, domain registrations increased 3% year over year... at cost registration would be $12 and they would then need to take away $120 from the principal and interest that grew to $910, leaving $790 to remain and begin collecting monthly dividends of approximately $79.
Now one lifetime registration at the 10-year mark is making the company $79 per month after renewing for an additional 10 years. There's absolutely no way that it can't be paid for.
I get it. You don't like Epik.
But that statement is, yikes. And to walk it back like "you know what I meant" is weak. You would be crushed on a debate stage and be made a fool of, in anything, if that's how you come prepared to any argument.
What went down at the domain sales/escrow/masterbucks level is pretty much the definition of a Ponzi Scheme.
Again, how? They are making payments. There were cash flow issues and they are all being addressed. I've already made a public statement on this in bold a page back and don't want to repeat myself. It was not operated at a Ponzi or "like" Ponzi. There's a difference between allocating money poorly and operating a Ponzi. You know the difference, you just want to muddy the water and put Epik + Ponzi + cash grab into a statement to make people question Epik, for whatever reason, I don't know, nor do I care. You aren't a customer there, so I don't even know why you're wasting energy attacking them. Just do a silent boycott and not use their products, much like people not buying Bud Light--I don't see people posting "I didn't buy Bud Light" today, they just aren't purchasing it and letting it be to die on its own. You just want to beat a dead horse (but I think it's far from dead, so I'm remaining... I have hope they will make it by the 22nd).
It's not like if Epik also proposed "lifetime" registrations. What will happen to these people, btw? Will Epik LLC honor the "lifetime" renewals? Or were these engagements conveniently left at the "old Epik" and won't be honored anymore?
Good question.
Instead of asking on a public forum, why don't you email customer support and then ask them? Your bias is showing by doing it this way... you are tainting their image more by proposing the question to people that don't know. I challenge you to email customer support, get the answer, and post it here. That is the way it should have been done, not in the manner that you did it. And, it's exactly how I addressed the $91,000 situation: I straight up asked them if she'd get a payout and it happened days later. Before bashing them publicly about not paying, I asked them if they anticipate on doing so, and I got a response... which I shared.