SedoCoUk said:Well -
A pertinant question would be why you would set a fixed price of 60 USD when the minimum commission is 50 USD.
A sales contract would be in effect.
A sales contract is an obligation to sell at 60 USD
The sales contract binds the buyer and seller to the sale.
The sales contract is legally binding.
The affected party would therefore decide how the disreputable seller should be consequenced.
Some decide to initiate legal proceedings, as is their right due to the breach of contract, while others decide not to.
That is a decision for the buyer, not for Sedo.
So - legal action would be one possible consequence.
The buyer could also decide on any number of other consequences, but we here at Sedo, would have no control over that.
We are not the domain police Matrix - be fair.
We can suspend the seller's account as a consequence of bad business practices, which would be yet another consequence.
We cannot hunt him down and force him to sell the domain to the buyer for 60 USD minus the 50 USD he would owe us in commission.
paymaster7 said:Now this just doesn't sound genuine. Hard to imagine that a 'service' meant to serve the user (in this case having a max of $10k on pricing) is actually a 'service' when the company providing it benefits because of it, because of the appraisal fee.
Just have a hard time believing that it's meant to protect users from overpriced domains (do we need that protection? can't one figure out pretty quickly if a domain is overpriced?) when its end result is to encourage people to line Sedo's pockets even more by paying for an appraisal.
Seems like you're double dipping there. It's a silly rule that should be dumped.
Just my two cents and I'm clearly not alone.
SedoCoUk said:I think we can all agree that disagreements and complaints are best handled on a one-to-one basis rather than on a forum where the subject of the thread can sometimes be mired in other topics and where emotional responses can negatively affect the outcome.
I found Sedo's customer service reps to be excellent. Whenever I have written with a problem or snag, I have always received prompt attention and a resolution to my issue. Nora has been consistently helpful. All companies have their unique qualities, problems, strengths. My opinion.SedoCoUk said:Should you wish to contine this dialogue with a representative of Sedo, I would ask you to contact us directly via email.
Kind Regards,
Nora Cotter
Domain Broker
[/QUOTE]carlton said:I found Sedo's customer service reps to be excellent. Whenever I have written with a problem or snag, I have always received prompt attention and a resolution to my issue. Nora has been consistently helpful. All companies have their unique qualities, problems, strengths. My opinion.
_______________________________________________
SEDO.COM :: Buy and Sell Domain Names and Websites
tel +49 (221)-420-758-287 :: fax +49 (212)-202-3951
email: [email protected] :: url: www.sedo.com
_______________________ :: make a name for yourself.
Don't overanalyze. Just some perspective on Sedo's customer service. No attack on you.paymaster7 said:Uhhh.. I don't understand what that has to do with the topic.
paymaster7 said:Now this just doesn't sound genuine. Hard to imagine that a 'service' meant to serve the user (in this case having a max of $10k on pricing) is actually a 'service' when the company providing it benefits because of it, because of the appraisal fee.
Just have a hard time believing that it's meant to protect users from overpriced domains (do we need that protection? can't one figure out pretty quickly if a domain is overpriced?) when its end result is to encourage people to line Sedo's pockets even more by paying for an appraisal.
Seems like you're double dipping there. It's a silly rule that should be dumped.
Just my two cents and I'm clearly not alone.
fxdomains.com said:Interesting discussion ! Just out of curiosity, the negative items raised against SEDO in this thread, how do they compare with afternic in your opinions ? Do you all feel afternic has a better grip on things like pricing (asking, fix, make offer, reserve etc) and also on enforcing sellers to sell for the agreed price ? If yes, is this due to afternic's system being better or afternic taking more responsibility ?
I'm quite curious about this as we have our whole domain portfolio with Afternic and with Sedo. We sold around 20 names via afternic and none via sedo.. not sure why
Regards,
Mike.
SedoCoUk said:Please think about it rationally:
It would be like Matrix replying to an advertisement in his local paper to buy a car for $5000.
He goes to buy the car for $5000 and the owner refuses to sell for anything less than $5500.
In this instance, Matrix' local paper is not at fault.
The seller of the car is at fault.
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators