What was the argument for the world needing .mobi again?
If Foxnews is promoting .mobi, why dont they use it? why redirect to a .com?
its the same argument of why we need .TV domains.... we dont when it comes all the way down to it. but, its a niche and alternative TLD thats being used heavily on TV these days. the only problem i have with .TV as a domainer is its a whole different game for a good number of the best domains.. premium renewal prices and such.
i can imagine how much flack the few .TV investors got in the early 2000's... this was before the explosion of online video, web 2.0, the social networking craze, etc. we are kind of in the same place with internet-on-mobile right now... a very very primitive state in the beginning stages... these are the dark ages.
are you sure?
obamamobile.mobi 16 characters (8 syllables)
obamamobile.com 15 characters (7 syllables)
.com is shorter and better
this doesnt really matter though, because a domainer already registered obamamobile
.com and either the domainer not want to sell it or they didnt even try to buy it.
they choose what is at this point "an alternative TLD in a niche field".... i expect a lot of this in the future. it doesnt even need to be THE mobile TLD to have value... they could have choose a .org, .info, etc but they went with the one that made the most sense when they realized they couldnt get the .com
and dominator, were you absolutely serious when you said "who needs a mobile campaign" ???