Originally posted by safesys
Wohl, negotiating the best price where both parties are happy is not ripping them off - its called business. I find it odd when other people feel empowered to determine what is a fair and equitable price level for something they do not own that is used in a manner with which they may not be familiar.
Nobody is forcing them to buy the domain - its hardly a necessity in the same way food and water is.
Of course domain sellers ask more than they would pay for the domain, otherwise there would be no margin.
Maybe your own price level is more indicative of your name quality/negotiation ability moreso than any moral stance.
Your view of what is a fair price for a domain name is misguided or perhaps you just donââ¬â¢t want to know the truth. A domain seller has the monopoly on a particular name. Whilst there is a market to set domain prices in general, if the seller asks a high price for one particular name and the buyer has a particular requirement for that, he has nowhere else to turn. If you wouldnââ¬â¢t pay $100 for a domain yourself, it is blatantly unreasonable to ask $1000 for it. If you donââ¬â¢t think you can make a worthwhile profit without ripping people off, you donââ¬â¢t need to buy.
The average quality of my names is higher than any of the big domain seller sites, as I only registered names where I could justify a $300 or above price tag. I have sold 300 domains equals a quarter of my collection in the last year, that says it all.
And it doesnââ¬â¢t take any negotiating skills to get lucky and sell a domain for a high amount, just try to persuade the buyer that you think that the crappy name is actually very ââ¬Ëmemorable and descriptiveââ¬â¢ and only drop the price once itââ¬â¢s clear youââ¬â¢re getting nowhere. Preferably have a site up that makes it look like youââ¬â¢ve put a lot of effort into the domain too, and say that you're not that bothered about selling as the domain is already bringing in revenue (never mind that it's only a few dollars per year).