Kishin said:How would they decide what Citys to make a City TLD? There are thousands if not millions,and what about ones from different countrys,or areas which citys have the same name,how would that work? For Example there is a ST Petersburg in Florida in the US and In Russia.Two very different places.No offence but sounds like a bad idea to me.
Freddy@EuroDNS said:It is a sponsored TLD.
every one that puts 2.000.000 on the table has the possibility to get an TLD.
Freddy@EuroDNS said:On Icann in Luxembourg I talked to some guys that want to setup a CityTLD .berlin (german capitol).
I will interview them in the next days a bit more. what do you think about it?
let me know!
CU
Freddy
hmmm...better go reg some 5 numbers on myself...heheDomainMaster said:sounds like a bad idea to me. City names are often repeated, so I propose using zipcodes instead lol
Absolutely true. The field is becoming confused and diluted, not more logical and intuitive. The introduction of all these varied extensions is mainly driven by a handful profiting at the expense of internet simplicity and reliability. The right of the dot is becoming indistinguishable from the left of the dot. We do not have enough intelligent internet governance, imo, and consequently the tld's are getting ridiculous.gpmgroup said:If you create more than a handful of carefully selected gTLDs all that will happen is you will push everybody further to .com as the only tld worth having.
ecollins said:I think they should wait and let other TLDs get more popular before adding more .crap TLDs like .md .ws .mp .mobi .whoreally .caresandwillnotgettypeintraffic