- Joined
- Dec 3, 2006
- Messages
- 14,984
- Reaction score
- 1,302
It all depends on intent.Double correct me if I'm wrong. credit card charge backs, are not like stealing money.
Fraud is fraud.
It all depends on intent.Double correct me if I'm wrong. credit card charge backs, are not like stealing money.
I'll give you guys the full story at some point, with permission from the person currently going through this. I often times side with businesses, but in this case the registrar really messed up, basically reneging on a deal with the registrant.
I think the registrant is prepared to lose all of the domains still at registrar X.
I am baffled that a credit card company would permit a chargeback IF this did extent beyond the 60 days.A person "Sam" registered a number of domains at registrar X.
Sam transferred half of the domains to registrar Z.
Joanne then did a credit card chargeback at registrar X,
If true, then I definitely am shocked. This and other similar events will lead to the downfall of on-line shopping as we know it.Fab, you might be shocked to know some (if not all) domain chargebacks have
been successful whether they're arguably justified or not. I don't remember if
all registrars get dinged chargeback "fees" for that, but it can hurt their ability
to take online credit card payments if that keeps up.
The credit card companies will not let this happens.If true, then I definitely am shocked. This and other similar events will lead to the downfall of on-line shopping as we know it.
Right now would be a good time to start building up proof that you / your friend own the domains (screenshots, screenshots of WhoIs, receipts, even if it means going to the registrar and getting them).
That way you can show that they are your domains.
Joanne then did a credit card chargeback at registrar X, but not for the domain names she transferred to Z...only the domains that were still at registrar X.