It appears Colin is one of the critics he mentions so why would he not trash .mobi?
Plus, Colin has his facts and figures so skewed and one sided that it is pathetic.
There is no "truth" in journalism anymore thanks to the internet. He makes blanket statements without support or any documentation whatsoever.
And, not surprising, he does not respond to emails or posts comment regarding his commentary.
Yes, I am pro-mobi. I am also pro-com, net, responsible gun and pet owners, healthcare for all, and more. But I am quickly finding myself to becoming more and more anti-mobi critic who criticize without any concrete substance to their points or critiques other than simply for the pleasure of expressing their own opinions, stroking themselves, and to get readers.
Controversy is free publicity. And in the domain world, there a few things controversial or highly talked about and TM violations, disaster regs, registrar and ICANN responsibility, and .mobi are the hot topics.
And it seems that the only ones talking about .mobi are domainers.
If Colin is a member of this forum, then publish the email and comments I sent you.
Not lashing at you, lashing at this Colin dude.I am not for or against .mobi either so don't beat me up I just have worked in wireless the last 10 years, I want a universal standard for mobile web pages no matter how it comes.k:
Hmmm give him a breakLet's get back to this for a second:
An industry entrepreneur does not own her full name domain - not only in .mobi, but also as a .com
Please explain to me why I would trust this person's authority on industry matters.
That's cause I was STOKED!you're link for 'stroking' is wrong dude
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators