She is quoting people in the article, doubtful (on appearances) she has much personal knowledge on domaining.
She quotes Charles Steinfield, chairperson of the Department of Telecommunication, Information Studies and Media at Michigan State University.
Charles Stanfield is available in charlessteinfield
.com
.net
.mobi
.org
.us
.us.com
.info
.tv
.cc
.bz
.biz
.co.uk
.eu
.de
Colin Gibbs, the author of the other piece referenced, is available as colingibbs extensions:
.net
.org
.us
.mobi
.info
.biz
.de
.tv
.eu
.bz
Now, notice ColinGibbs.com is taken. Is it him? Who knows. The name has been regged since 2000 and is a parked page.
But he quotes other articles and reports that I have already seen. So is this true journalism? Does anyone interview anyone on a one-to-one basis anymore?
In the age of blogging, all it takes is a keyboard, a site, an RSS feed, and add a comment here and there and you have instant content. Very little original thought. But it's all about content.
The author, Melissa Campanelli, has 385 other articles (?) from
www.entrepreneur.com for Melissa Campanelli. (0.15 seconds). As a writer, I would imagine you are given assignments or create an interesting story line. Too bad little first hand knowledge is needed anymore in journalism.