Fab+ launched

[James]

Is there a link to a tutorial for fab+..I am able to generate custom pages but they don't seem to be getting published

jim

BTW mike how about a .mobi compliant template??

 

[gnie]

Looks great.
But some problems remained to be fixed.
Some of my gambling domains doesn't show Related Topics on their landing pages.

 

[dvestors]

Some of my gambling domains doesn't show Related Topics on their landing pages.

You have to change your gambling names back to Fab 5.0. It's not pulling the same gambling feed on Fab+ as it does on 5.0..atleast at this point, it's not.

 

[gnie]

You have to change your gambling names back to Fab 5.0. It's not pulling the same gambling feed on Fab+ as it does on 5.0..atleast at this point, it's not.

I believe you are correct at the moment. The revenue per click of gambling domain is 0.2 dollars with Fab+ at this time. But I hope this is just a bug from the initiation of upgrade.

 

[Mike Robertson]

Hi guys,

You can view a tutorial/walkthrough for Fab+ here.

The issue with Gambling domains should now be resolved.

I apologize for any inconveniences caused and I hope you all enjoy the new landers.

Let me know if you have any comments/questions.

Cheers,

Mike
Fabulous.com

 

[James]

resolving nicely now mike...the "text" for sale is a little small though and about the .mobi template??

Thanks,

jim

 

[Mike Robertson]

Thanks for the note Jim - I'll get the tech guys to look into the For Sale text size.

In regards to .mobi domains - unfortunately we have no future plans to offer a solution for these types of domains.

Cheers,

Mike
Fabulous.com

 

[pleasedelete]

Hi Mike,

I assume that you already know a great deal about the performance of different layouts since Fabulous has a large portfolio to test them with. Can you tell us what layout format produced the best results in your test? I don't really care what my pages look like, I just care to know which layout produces the best results and I would rather not wait for the auto optimizer to tell me it.

Any input would be appreciated.

Bill

 

[Mike Robertson]

Hi Bill,

Early indications from testing on our own portfolio have Layouts 5 and 8 performing best out of the graphic templates. And Layout 1 is the best non-graphic.

But this is based on our domains; different portfolios may generate different results.

Also, Jim - the issue with font size on For Sale links should now be resolved.

Let me know if there are any other issues/comments.

Cheers,

Mike
Fabulous.com

 

[pleasedelete]

Is non graphic usually better than graphic, or is graphic usually better than non graphic (assuming the pics are related)?

 

[Mike Robertson]

Hi Bill,

The two graphic layouts mentioned in my post above have generated better results than the non-graphic page.

Again, this is on our own portfolio, others may yield different results.

Cheers,

Mike
Fabulous.com

 

[A D]

Any sample sites?

-=DCG=-

 

[alldig]

sample domains (on auto-optimization):

www.rotisserie.com
www.freecoupon.com
www.housepaint.com
www.leathersofa.com
www.petkennel.com

 

[A D]

Very nice.

-=DCG=-

 

[socalboy]

To give you an idea of what the system can do, here are some I've customized:

www.Animatic.net
www.Bullionz.com
www.CownoseRay.com
www.Diabulimic.com
www.HotelWilliam.com
www.KonaKohala.com
www.South-PadreIsland.com
www.TasselLoafers.com

-SoCalBoy

 

[SDX]

VERY NICE! :yes:

 

[Namebrander]

im a big fan of fab + but was hoping to see higher click throughs - not noticed any ctr improvements thus far how about you guys

 

[socalboy]

Just checked, and seeing more than 50% increase so far here.

 

[whitebark]

Hi Mike

Are adult domains going to be switched over to Fab+. I've only got one or two there but can't seem to get them to switch over to the new system.

And what are the chances of having some text copy added for the search engines? Even if it's just 100 words or so - and I've got no problem with waiting for the text copy being approved before being set live.

Thanks!

 

[Mike Robertson]

Hi Whitebark,

Unfortunately we do not allow Adult domains to use the Fab+ graphic landers.

In regards to text, we are looking at ways to include a welcome/intro text to the new landers. Hopefully this will be included in a future release.

I'll keep you posted.

Cheers,

Mike
Fabulous.com