Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every DNForum feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

Frank Schilling Loses loses generic name on aweful UDRP decision

Status
Not open for further replies.

jberryhill

Philadelphia Lawyer
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
12
Maybe there is a problem with the registrar transferring the domain.

Gee, I wonder who owns the registrar?

No. There is a lawsuit.

The fastest route to de-accreditation for any registrar is failure to implement the UDRP.
 

namestrands

The Bishop
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
3,924
Reaction score
6
Lets hope it makes a difference..

I subscribe to the WIPO lists, and I have to say the decisions are questionable. The financial incentive for Panelists to find in favour of the complainant is astounding.. I appreciate that they declare impartiality, but still.. if they were not to be complainant supportive then the complainants would not chose them..

The principle of the UDRP is sound, the execution however is flawed.
 

David G

Internet Entrepreneur
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Messages
5,755
Reaction score
63
No. There is a lawsuit.

The fastest route to de-accreditation for any registrar is failure to implement the UDRP.

Can I ask you in what court and jurisdiction the lawsuit was filed?
 

DaddyHalbucks

Domain Buyer
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
3,142
Reaction score
18
No. There is a lawsuit.

The fastest route to de-accreditation for any registrar is failure to implement the UDRP.

I wasn't suggesting that anyone was flouting the UDRP. I guess what I meant to suggest was that the registrar had a small amount of discretion to hold the domain in cases where the UDRP was clearly erroneous and where there was a pending lawsuit.

The existence of the lawsuit clarifies it all. Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Premium Members

Upcoming events

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom