Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every DNForum feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

Future of .name

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zona

Arizona Wildcats
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2006
Messages
674
Reaction score
0
I have one .name domains - lbj.name - and I am just wondering what your thoughts are on the future of the .name extension?

:popcorn:
 

dolansco

LLL or HELLL
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2006
Messages
1,179
Reaction score
1
poor ...

to me , its the extention that does not count ...
 

Bill Roy

Level 8
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2005
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
35
I consider it a 'dead suffix'.
 

etech-peter

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
The future doesn't look very good for .name in terms of it's value or it's popularity. .name is a good extension for a personal sites only.
 

StockDoctor

** Mr. Pink **
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2002
Messages
2,455
Reaction score
0
How it ever started in the first place is amazing.
 

david4

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
i agree with 'no future' saying.

But why?? it came up with .biz,.info together???

why it became that poor???
 

StockDoctor

** Mr. Pink **
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2002
Messages
2,455
Reaction score
0
i agree with 'no future' saying.

But why?? it came up with .biz,.info together???

why it became that poor???
Because it makes no sense at all. Trying to force generic keywords with .name is a complete joke on domainers. If people think forcing generics on .tv and .cc are bad, .name makes them look like champs. Info and biz are fine when used for their intended purpose, and allow a much wider span. The extension is a complete imbarassment to the industry me thinks.
 

GodBlessYou

Level 7
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2004
Messages
910
Reaction score
0
i have a friend who likes .names and I tell him it's a waste of money. I guess its personal opinion but I don't think .name is good, never owned one prolly never will.
 

demo

DNF Member
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2006
Messages
438
Reaction score
0
they are worthless, especially considering the restrictiions have when purchasing them:
.name restrictions
Registrations in the .name TLD must constitute an individual's "Personal Name". For purposes of the .name restrictions (the "Restrictions"), a "Personal Name" is a person's legal name, or a name by which the person is commonly known. A "name by which a person is commonly known" includes, without limitation, a pseudonym used by an author or painter, or a stage name used by a singer or actor.
 

Ian

DNF Exclusive
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
1,616
Reaction score
5
One of the worst extensions to be introduced by ICANN ever! Makes me wonder why they rejected the .xxx extenstion yet let this .name crap go thru!!!
 

editionblog

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
197
Reaction score
0
.name has no future

Future is .cc easy to write and most of people like it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 2) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

No members online now.

Premium Members

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom