Dave Zan said:
Glad to see this resolved. Looks fair to me.
Unless, of course, someone becomes more "demanding".
In any case, this is a great lesson especially for newbies about to do a similar
thing.
Dave, guess I ought to be more "demanding" in this whole incident, for the benefit of all.
danielschnarr said:
Sorry - I'm a busy guy ... Sorry about the delay in time. Acroplex I have awarded you the domain, GEODSL. The way I typically buy domains is like you have with this one. Since it was the first post, and I thought it was you who pm'd me regarding the post, you get it. Besides you kept true to your word, paying on time like stated, very business like and professional. Domain is pushed.
Chord - Is a
great member, very fair and hopes for the best in all situations. He's kept a positive contact with me and I award him A FREE DOMAIN OF HIS CHOICE from the sale list.
It's in my nature to try and work things out positively, so, it is not in my nature to accept the "FREE BEER" offer -- I dont drink
.
Since there was confusion, and anger, I think the best choice is to award the original poster -- "SOLD" the domain. Chord, please post "SOLD" on every thread from now on, as then it won't cause confusion. Chord, please check your PMs as I have sent you a PM regarding your free domain for being such a good person.
Sorry to both Chord and Acroplex as this issue was hard to sort out.
I hope it doesn't affect future business practices.
Sincerely,
Daniel.
Daniel, I respect but I couldn't agree with your decision. As this thread might set an odd precedent to similar problems in the future, thus for the purpose of putting the record right, and to disperse your allegation of
"confusion" caused by my PM, I must emphasize the following:
(1) In case you're not aware, private transactions via PM are extremely common at DnForum.
(2) Your sales thread mentioned
neither "Post Sold to claim" nor "No PM". Thus it was obvious that you did not reject PM as a form of communication to you. Had you mentioned either, I would have posted Sold instead of PM Sold.
(3) Since this thread is now in legal section, let me air my view from a legal standpoint - You made an offer to sell, the acceptance came when I PM Sold to you. The PM timestamped
2:40 PM EST. With both offer and acceptance, there is a binding contract between you and me.
[ A lawyer's view on this is much appreciated. ]
(4) Theo posted Sold later, the post timestamped
5:22 PM EST. In other words, Theo's claim is invalid as it only came
2 hours and 42 mins after my PM.
I understand that you might have no prior experience in handling private transactions. An experienced seller will NEVER treat the PM and post coming from the same person, without verifying first. Your mistakes had misleaded Theo into believing that he was the first to claim the domain, and it later snowballed to such a mess.
Theo had since withdrawn his candidacy from this sale. Daniel, I just couldn't understand your logic in arriving into such a decision. Had you been more experienced or vigilant, such "confusion" would never arise. Thanks for your free domain offer, but I'll pass.
Btw, gracious of you Theo, I'd love to hear your view on this.
For the benefit of all, I would strongly second SirSpider's suggestion that a default guideline to be put in place. To elaborate, for a sales thread that mentioned neither "Post Sold to claim" nor "No PM", DnForum ought to have a guideline to dictate explicitly whether PM is accepted as a form of communication or otherwise. This is necessary as to protect the interest of all parties in all future transactions.
Thanks for all who have contributed so far
.