- Joined
- Sep 15, 2009
- Messages
- 3,478
- Reaction score
- 1,189
He did put in writing, however the type of house was not specified (smart) :lol:
Doll house!?![]()
Maybe he meant a .house
He did put in writing, however the type of house was not specified (smart) :lol:
Doll house!?![]()
Even the "cloud" involves physical data storage somewhere. The technology competing with hard drives would be flash memory (solid-state drives). Cloud storage just involves putting your "belongings" (i.e. data) in a remote storage unit / hosting center rather than keeping them at home.
Your laptop and tablet and smart phone will still need to store data themselves, no matter how pervasive remote cloud hosting becomes.
And not all of us are thrilled with our data being kept elsewhere. "The Cloud" makes government censorship and Google-type spying a whole lot easier, for example. Local storage devices are more secure in that sense.
Maybe the general public will be lured into the cloud. But there will still be some of us who store data in an object we can see and touch -- something Big Brother can't just erase without our knowledge or permission.
WhoDatDog, dude you need to slow up on the haterade my brother are you all coked up or something?? I think your negative rant may have been a bit overboard don't you?? Yes, definitely. Appraise the name but don't appraise the appraisers or its time to get appraised yourself
You might also end up owing this dude a house! :lol:
He did put in writing, however the type of house was not specified (smart) :lol:
Doll house!?![]()
I think that we're closer than you may realize (I've been in IT for about 25 years, work wise.) to physical storage being outdated. There will always be a need, but as mentioned by Chris above, the current trend is towards high end (i.e. solid-state) storage and even moreso towards cloud storage on networked storage providers like Dropbox, Onedrive, iCloud, Google Drive, etc.
So, this is worth oodles more than , say, compact-disc.com (or even bluray-disc) but it's just a matter of time.
I say $xxxx (even with a dash which detracts, in English) but the value with decrease in time over the next few years, IMPO.
Rob
Maybe he meant a .house![]()
I don't know, even the term Solid-State ends in Drive. It's still hard enough to knock someone out with. Even if they go to SSD, cloud computing, or something else... it can always be brandable in the future and hold a historic sense to it for anyone 15 and older (I'll just take a stab at an age range) at this time being that everything we grew up with was a "drive" (5.25" Floppy Drive, 3.5" Drive, CD-ROM Drive, DVD-ROM Drive, Thumb Drive, Hard Drive) to be a "hard" copy of your current "drive" or data needed to be stored.
As a brandable, it retains value. I would go to say that this one doesn't lose value, as the pendulum swings from it being a product (albeit hyphenated, I think the Double D's make it work) to a brandable-if it ever comes to that.
I for one like cloud, but like it on my network... not someone else's. I have a personal cloud that I can physically touch if I want and nobody else can access. With privacy being a huge concern, hard drives, or a way to store data for safekeeping isn't going away anytime soon.
I'd stick with Focus' valuation of it being mid 4 to 5 figure end user since he's been around the city a couple times and back as well as my personal experience *EDIT*
And people do not even understand basic contract law. I said run it through here in a sales thread and if you get a few hundred dollars for it I would buy you a house. Well, first of all, no reasonable person would believe that I would buy you some 500K house in Connecticut if you sold the name for $200 here, which would basically prove that I was right about the name. But it wouldn't matter anyways, because there is no contract without "consideration". In other words, if we are playing in a Dn Forum softball league, and you are at the plate, and I yell to you that if you hit a homerun I will buy you a car, then even if you hit a homerun on the next pitch, there is no car owed. There is no contract, since you did not give up anything.
But even if there was a contract, which in this case there was not, I could buy you any type of house, including a Lego house. But I wouldn't try to get out of any type of deal with tactics like this. But it all points back to the lack of basic understanding of reality here. No understanding of reality, no understanding or law, no understanding of the value of this name.
I'd say mid-xxxx. For the hyphen haters, end users are still buying them. Domainers are generally not. You'll be lucky to go over $500 if you auction it. Maybe $1000. For end-users, a mid four figure price is perfectly possible. You may want to move it, though, as RTM's point about technology changes is something to consider. I've turned down good offers only to see a technology-based domain become obsolete. It happens fast and it isn't pretty.
One word concerning the appraisals: they are always going to be a best case scenario and extrapolative effort, because domain names are not liquid assets, with a few exceptions like generic keywords/NNN/LLL etc.
One word concerning the appraisals: they are always going to be a best case scenario and extrapolative effort, because domain names are not liquid assets, with a few exceptions like generic keywords/NNN/LLL etc.
The stars have to align somewhat. If they didn't, then we wouldn't have a lot of sales, especially the 5- or 6-figure sales. I would like to ask WD what he thinks of all the domains he posted for sale, that didn't sell on the spot (to a limited audience of resellers and not qualified end users). Logically, he should dump every single one of them.
Realistically, this domain could fetch mid-$$$$ and more (I don't know), but the question is when.
It's a question of circumstances, having the right end user at the right time is when you maximize the domain value.
Often timing is more important than the asking price.
Harddrive.com reportedly sold for 200K and while I don't like to make abusive comparisons, somebody could see value in this name as well.
And other comments here are just as ridiculous. I might be the only one on the forum who 100 percent of the time has been a man of his word. Maybe there is someone else, but I pass the test with flying colors, and even my track record of exposing scammers is 100 percent documented fact here and elsewhere. And people do not even understand basic contract law. I said run it through here in a sales thread and if you get a few hundred dollars for it I would buy you a house. Well, first of all, no reasonable person would believe that I would buy you some 500K house in Connecticut if you sold the name for $200 here, which would basically prove that I was right about the name. But it wouldn't matter anyways, because there is no contract without "consideration". In other words, if we are playing in a Dn Forum softball league, and you are at the plate, and I yell to you that if you hit a homerun I will buy you a car, then even if you hit a homerun on the next pitch, there is no car owed. There is no contract, since you did not give up anything.
Yes, they areIt has nothing to do with domainers being overly optimistic about the value of domain names?![]()
It's also worth noting that there has been 361 visitors to the Sedo listing in the last month.
Don't you think that may have something to do with this thread?
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators