- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
- Messages
- 2,574
- Reaction score
- 12
"I have done trademark search and the term kazaa, as of right now is not trademarked."
Congratulations.
I have spent several years practicing law, and have represented parties in dozens of domain name disputes and lawsuits. While I'm not going to give standard lecture #57 on the topic of "Not Registered Does Not Mean 'No Trademark'", does it at all strike you as odd that the "300 million downloads" figure appears in the very papers you are reading at this minute? Do you think that's because I'm psychic, or because I might know something?
The fact of the matter is that within the last couple of weeks, Kazaa has mass-filed on a slew of domain names, which is why that lawyer in Encino doesn't have time to return your call.
If your two other domain names do not incorporate or otherwise trade on Kazaa's name, then giving up the other two is a fine idea. UDRP's on multiple names are not all-or-nothing proposition, and there have been many cases which split up groups of names into "transferred" and "not transferred". In fact, offering up the two which you admit are a problem is a very good path toward keeping the other two, as long as the picture is made clear to the panel.
But, having seen several other Kazaa complaints in the last few weeks, I'm not going to debate the point about whether they have a trademark for P2P software. They clearly do in any common law jurisdiction, regardless of their registration status.
Congratulations.
I have spent several years practicing law, and have represented parties in dozens of domain name disputes and lawsuits. While I'm not going to give standard lecture #57 on the topic of "Not Registered Does Not Mean 'No Trademark'", does it at all strike you as odd that the "300 million downloads" figure appears in the very papers you are reading at this minute? Do you think that's because I'm psychic, or because I might know something?
The fact of the matter is that within the last couple of weeks, Kazaa has mass-filed on a slew of domain names, which is why that lawyer in Encino doesn't have time to return your call.
If your two other domain names do not incorporate or otherwise trade on Kazaa's name, then giving up the other two is a fine idea. UDRP's on multiple names are not all-or-nothing proposition, and there have been many cases which split up groups of names into "transferred" and "not transferred". In fact, offering up the two which you admit are a problem is a very good path toward keeping the other two, as long as the picture is made clear to the panel.
But, having seen several other Kazaa complaints in the last few weeks, I'm not going to debate the point about whether they have a trademark for P2P software. They clearly do in any common law jurisdiction, regardless of their registration status.