There shouldn't be any difference between tld's; otherwise this would just mean discrimination. There is a discrimination in Corporate world against anything but .com; this doesn't mean .com is better; this just means corruption. Search engines care about money and power coming from information they collect from users. Do tld's have anything to do with this? Google banned a tld (something like co.cl?) because it was full of spam. We have a quality info site which did very well for many years, so at least in those days there was no discrimination against .info at least. Also we were told officially that it was a quality site. Now we are almost banned. There is no explanation. Only explanation is "quality issue"? What quality issue: you congratulate us for having such a quality site officially, and then you ban us and say there is a quality issue; although we made no change on the site. Is Google a better search engine now? No, we see spam sites all the time; although they are not as obvious as previous spam sites. I suspect Google manually determines rankings of sites now for many hot searches; and you think their algorithm is good. Maximizing profit and power, this is all the purpose. We knew of course being dependent on a search engine is risky although we were doing well. Once there is monopoly they can do anything they want; ban many info or other sites manualy just because they don't like something. Sedo is discriminating against info and more against biz. Search for a keyword; although your domain is listed there as exact match, it is not shown on the list. You need to click another link to see it. "something.com" already registered: so hire a broker to get it, although it is not listed on sedo as for sale. .biz is shown below .com.br