Betting against technology - there's a bright idea.
I am hardly the one betting against technology. I have embraced it.
Auto detection will not catch up to technology for years. How is auto detect going to possibly read your mind to detect what it is you want to see and do not want to see?
Not going to happen for years. And perhaps not in our lifetimes for a browser to be so intuitive that it works on your thoughts.
It seems that the overwhelming majority of members here are the one betting against technology.
Are you for the getting bigger is better school of thought? Do you really think people want to
I used the example of scrolling simply to illustrate a point of taking a full PC site and making it about 3 inches x 4 inches. Have you actually tried this? Have you actually tried taking the iPhone and using it to view a full blown website? It is going to take some time to find what it is you are looking for. That simple. It does not pop up to the exact spot it is you want to be in.
Yes, every one loves it. The technology behind the touch screen and scrolling with fingers.
While my wife and I were waiting for a flight, I let her use the iPod Touch. She found the task of going to a site and trying to find what she was looking for annoying.
Try this. Look at NWF.org on your mobile device.
Then look at NWF.mobi.
What works best for the mobile?
Water-down? Not hardly. De-cluttered. De-cluttered to the point of if you want the images, you have the option of adding the images back in.
Regardless, I am hardly the one betting against technology here. You obviously are oblivious to technology and trends and are still betting on the old 1958 Edsel Ranger being the car of the future.
I do not disdain .com or any extension for that matter. But if you want to be tied down to your PC or laptop the rest of your life rather move forward, that is entirely up to you.
I think you have a future as a CEO of one of the Big 3 automakers or perhaps a Madison Ave. Advertising exec preaching everything is fine and it is back to business as usual.
At least as CEO they will not be standing in the un-employment lines.
It's the truth. I've yet to meet a single person with a new phone who has complained about load times, scrolling or any other nonsense used by mobi-fans to try to make it seem like a neutered website is the way to go
If you know nothing else and have not experienced anything different, then you have nothing to compare it to.
That is the simplicity of it.
And it does not take a genius to keep up with the news and trends regarding the NA continent lagging WAY behind the progress of Asia in Europe in terms of internet and mobile speed, technology, and usability.
Touch screens is nothing new to them at all but all of a sudden Jobs and company wants to proclaim the creator of the touchscreen combination phone. Sounds like an Al Gore complex to me.
And you have never answered a question I posed a long time ago.
When will you mandate which extension, prefix, or suffix to use to determine which one and only one those that are bastardizing the internet will use to access a mobile site?
Like I said time and time again, the world is not listening to domainers. They want ease of access and portability. They want simplicity.
And if you think it is bad now, just wait until at a minimum 2 years from now when perhaps 100 or 200 or more new gTLD's are released into the masses.
Then you can decide what is the best, most accurate, and most descriptive term to access mobile.
Go ahead - have your say now. Mandate that one way that all the world gets to a mobile site on a mobile device.