John Zuccarini

[Dave Zan]

I believe he was sentenced to 3 years back in 2003.

30 months or 2 1/2 years, to be exact:

http://www.whois.sc/news/2004-02/john-zuccarini.html

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/02/27/1077676936503.html?oneclick=true

Are there other cases awaiting him upon release?

 

[Theo]

Are there other cases awaiting him upon release?

I believe by entering a guilty plea it ensures all charges are consolidated - of course he cannot repeat his former feat for which he was convicted.

 

[StockDoctor]

The Internet was formed by former military and research scientists. The fact that it's considered a wide forum nowadays is thanks to extensive consumer marketing.

Agree.

Want a "wonderful learning tool" for kids? Get them Encyclopaedia Britannica - the printed version.

I'm sure the kids would give you the same response and like to tell you what to do with it. You think you have more right than they do to the Internet? You don't have any kids do you?

On the subject of effective parenting, I support the various blocking software like NetNanny etc that effectively blocks questionable content.

I also support those blocking software. Doesn't justify a anything goes attitude or forgiving slimeballs like Zuke the Puke.

Lastly, I own Pentalpha.org - does that make me a satanist?

Not at all. Doing any website you want is fine. Freedom of speech ya know. Picking a kiddie domain and sticking porn on it does not make anyone an entrepreneur, it makes them a slimeball, no matter what other safeguards there are. You do see the difference right? If there were no slimeballs, we wouldn't need the blocking software would we? When we catch them, lock em up and let em experience a little of what they publish.

 

[Mr. Deleted]

Not at all. Doing any website you want is fine. Freedom of speech ya know. Picking a kiddie domain and sticking porn on it does not make anyone an entrepreneur, it makes them a slimeball, no matter what other safeguards there are. You do see the difference right? If there were no slimeballs, we wouldn't need the blocking software would we? When we catch them, lock em up and let em experience a little of what they publish.

Pentalpha.org - first of all you know that that domain is not a kids domain, so if a kid, or an adult types it in, they will will find that they are looking for.

But if you type in kidsforum.com you would not expect to find a porn site.

 

[Theo]

Pentalpha.org - first of all you know that that domain is not a kids domain, so if a kid, or an adult types it in, they will will find that they are looking for.

But if you type in kidsforum.com you would not expect to find a porn site.

A friend of mine let his daughter - a 7 year old - roam on the Internet. She would type keywords, like cocacola.com, drink.com etc

If you allow your underage kids to roam on the Internet like this, you are bound to get some nasty surprises, e.g there is no bread at buns.com :-D

 

[MerlinK]

If you allow your underage kids to roam on the Internet like this, you are bound to get some nasty surprises, e.g there is no bread at buns.com :-D

LOL! Theo, I nominate that as the quote of the week: "There is no bread at buns.com"

-Merlin

 

[Mr. Deleted]

lol i see there those exeptions to every rule. (bah) :-/ I have 3 year old twins and a 3 month old, but I know that one day they will follow me in doing internet business... My Shannon even said so today! So I will have to teach them a few things about the net. I don't want them to see those kind of buns LOL

 

[mike031]

lol :cheeky:

but what kills me though is the fact that he could of earned so much more with his typos if he had used some ppc.... i mean, after all.. how many 10, 12 or 15 year olds have credit cards to sign-up with porno sites??? very little sales/leads came through i would imagine.. and yet he still made out with millions?!