zachbb said:
Well, at least in my opinion, I don't see how sending an email can be legit as it is VERY hard to track the original sender. This makes it of questionable validity. On the other hand, sending fake C&D via the post is well defined as being fraud, and if your in the united states, I believe its a Federal charge. So it would make sense for companies to only send c&ds via post...
?
I wasn't going to post a again on this thread because of the stupid posts by several people, but I feel I have to because some people obviously need help.
C+D = A letter sent to a party to inform of an alleged act which the sender asks you to sop what you are doing. This letter could be long and technical, or short, sweet and personable. Either way, you have been informed of an alleged act and you were asked to stop.
This letter could be sent mail, certified, email, donkey.. it don't matter. The responses of "say you never got it" or "ignore it" shows the character of the person repsonding.
In this day of technology, emails are a perfectly acceptable form of communication. And yes, there are email tracking software, I have it. When I use it, it shows when it was sent, the EXACT date and time it was opened, the IP it was opened from, how many times the email was open, if the person forwarded the email to another person, it even gives a map of the possible location where the email was opened, and it sends you a digital certificate receipt yo my email. All of this is legally accepted in the court of law as proof of delivery to the reciepient.. AND THIS IS ALL DONE WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE PERSON WHO RECEIVED THE EMAIL. So please stop this "you can't track emails crap". I know if I was a lawyer, I would be using it all the timie and maybe they are using it too. (btw- each time my ex-wifes lawyer claims, in writing, my ex-wife never recieved an email from me, the judge is gonna know her character)
Ok, so this thread, there was an email C+D from a person that we know works for a law firm which has been verified... So what is the issue here???? We all know you are infringing on the TM, we know you are doing it in bad faith, and all they asked if for you not to renew the domain. You are getting off easy and they are being nice. They do not want the domain, so people saying it is a fraud, I don't see why since they ask for nothing accept stop using thier TM in bad faith.
To the others here who don't have a clue, please stop posting in legals until you get a grasp. I'm sorry to be pissy about this, but come on, people come to legals for good advice, not BS like I've read in this thread.
noshi said:
In that case, why not just offer them to buy the name from you?
noshi
Why???? because that is bad faith.... You piss them off after they are clearly being very generous, then they turn around and make an example of you.
It is funny how people always say "well someone else could register it" like you even care about the company. If you cared, you would have not registered the TM domain in the first place. They want it to expire, then so be it.