Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every DNForum feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!
Sedo

NSI changes registrant agreement to allow takeover of expired domains?

Status
Not open for further replies.

jberryhill

Philadelphia Lawyer
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
12
Amazing to see, that there is noone who could do anything against this new system.

Oh, there is.

But you aren't going to like it.

The key to ICANN politics is knowing which factions to play off of one another, while always recognizing that domain registrants don't count for beans.

What needs to happens is to spread a rumor that cybersquatters intend to use this system in order to shill-bid renewals on their expiring trademark domain names. This will allow them to extract money from trademark owners without doing it directly. Whether it is the nub of a workable cybersquatting strategy or not, if the "right people" in the trademark peanut gallery even *think* that this system might be useful to cybersquatters, then they will scream like stuck pigs.

However, one of the imbalances that has developed in ICANN-land over the last two years is that a lot of the trademark lobby has gotten bored and left. You can see by looking at the annual rate of decrease in UDRP proceedings. But there still might be enough well-placed mouth-breathing trademark lawyers capable of throwing a spanner into the works.
 
Dynadot - Expired Domain Auctions

GeorgeK

Leap.com
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
May 17, 2002
Messages
2,252
Reaction score
69
John: Looks like ICANN is starting to react:

http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-21sep04-2.htm

"Expired Domain Deletion Policy"

From:http://www.icann.org/registrars/eddp.htm

" Extenuating circumstances are defined as: UDRP action, valid court order, failure of a Registrar's renewal process (which does not include failure of a registrant to respond)"

The bolded part is there for obvious reasons. :party:

ICANN also made an advisory regarding the NSI changes.

http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-21sep04-1.htm

But, they didn't comment as to the legitimacy of the services. Looks like the hamsters are back on the treadmill.
 

Luc

Old school
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2002
Messages
1,574
Reaction score
5
seems like the more things change, the more they stay the same.

great find guys. thanks for all the input.
 

GeorgeK

Leap.com
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
May 17, 2002
Messages
2,252
Reaction score
69
hehe Luc. The real winners in all this are those selling popcorn, as we munch away while watching this neverending soap-opera.

I just sent the following email to the ICANN mailing lists, to get them to do more:

--- begin note ------------------
Hello,

As a followup to the prior news regarding the NSI anti-competitive move to hijack expired domains from their prior owners, ICANN has stepped up with 2 announcements:

1) http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-21sep04-2.htm

This one attempts to implement an Expired Domain Deletions Policy (EDDP), with 3 months notice (won't take effect immediately). What have they been doing for the past *11 MONTHS*, as there has not been a single thing preventing them from doing this when it was approved in CARTHAGE, TUNISIA in 2003!

http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-31oct03.htm

The EDDP contains the interesting language:

http://www.icann.org/registrars/eddp.htm

"Extenuating circumstances are defined as: UDRP action, valid court order, failure of a Registrar's renewal process (***which does not include failure of a registrant to respond***),"

I assume the part between *** and *** is there to put a stop to the abusive practice of NSI taking over their clients' expired domains.

2) ICANN issued an *advisory* regarding the NSI/SnapNames actions:

http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-21sep04-1.htm

However, they do not comment whether those auctions under the "old rules" (i.e until December 21, when EDDP is to take effect) have legitimacy. With the first auctions of NSI expiring on Wednesday, September 22, 2004 (today!), bidders need to know whether those auctions are legitimate, and will not be made void at some later date.

ICANN needs to do more, and quickly. It's not like they've not been on notice of this by me and others for the past 3 years, sheesh. This was drama that if ICANN had been doing its job, would have been pre-empted entirely. Instead, the market is shaken up for the next 3 months, or until NSI backs down, or is sued, etc.

I can see NSI upping the stakes by changing their agreement to transfer the domain to themselves BEFORE expiry, for example, to get around these changes. The guys at NSI are not going to give up --- they're constantly thinking up ways to abuse the marketplace, and recreate their former monopoly. The time has come to make iron-clad rules that put things back in registrants' favour, permanently.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
---- end note --------------

ICANN would be ever so popular if they just did everything I say. :party:
 

ExpireGuy

DNF Member
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
383
Reaction score
1
GeorgeK said:
http://www.icann.org/registrars/eddp.htm
ICANN needs to do more, and quickly. It's not like they've not been on notice of this by me and others for the past 3 years, sheesh. This was drama that if ICANN had been doing its job, would have been pre-empted entirely. Instead, the market is shaken up for the next 3 months, or until NSI backs down, or is sued, etc.

Agreed.

ICANNs fallacy at indoctrinating protocols is the main catalyst to the problems as mentioned. In the end it'll be the domainer(endusers) who'll suffer the brunt if and when legal actions ensue. I for one simply can't forsee other registrars who are currently benefitting from the drop market, conforming to Netsols hazordous precedents. Especially when they (Netsol) have such a lion share.

BTW: Kudos to George and jberryhill. Your insights in this regard are appreciated.
 

pleasedelete

Level 5
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
355
Reaction score
0
The real winners in all this are those selling popcorn, as we munch away while watching this neverending soap-opera.

Yea, or fiddle faddle in my case...

I'm still in shock... I was starting to enjoy using Club Drop. Don't even have a SnapNames account yet...
 

Biggie

DNForum Moderator
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2002
Messages
15,043
Reaction score
2,235
it seems to me that eventually,all registrars will try to retain rights to "valuable" expired domains by ......."any means necessary"!

I can envision a time where.......deleted two character/letter .org's will be brought back from the dead pool......in an auction!
 

Dave Zan

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,700
Reaction score
10
Quick question, though a bit off-topic: are those registrars and hosting
providers allowed to edit their service agreements without, say, asking
their customers to click on a link to read it, then click on the box to
agree to it again?

You know how it is when people make a big fuss over changes made to
service agreements or contracts midway, and they never got the chance
to read and agree to it again or not, even though they initially did the
minute they signed up...

Not surprising what NetSol has done recently. It was bound to happen
since, I'm sure, they've been keeping track of the expiry market and how
SnapNames got trounced over in the recent weeks by its competitors.

As long as ICANN remains a "club", there's not much good to expect
from it. But that's still no reason to quit trying, anyway.

Hmmmm, regarding Jberryhill's suggestion about spreading a rumor, I just
got a rumor that... :-D
 

jberryhill

Philadelphia Lawyer
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
12
bidders need to know whether those auctions are legitimate, and will not be made void at some later date.

Oh, I wouldn't worry about that. ICANN is useless in recovering stolen domain names. There is no power to "void" registrations because they didn't like the way they were assigned.
 

ExpireGuy

DNF Member
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
383
Reaction score
1
jberryhill said:
Oh, I wouldn't worry about that. ICANN is useless in recovering stolen domain names. There is no power to "void" registrations because they didn't like the way they were assigned.

The bold lettering says it all.
 

clemzonguy

Domain Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
2,635
Reaction score
0
All of this is starting to give me a headache..... lol
Thanks again GeorgeK & Berryhill for sharing your time and research.
 

Dave Zan

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,700
Reaction score
10
All the more reason, then, why we must keep making noises to ICANN about
this. If ICANN just won't listen, then we'll need another way...somehow...
 

OnSpec

Level 6
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2003
Messages
676
Reaction score
1
Stocdoctor said:
Exactly why we domainers need some organization of our interests as the consumers
in this market to apply pressure to the ultimate authority the DOC.
Doc

Hmmmm... time to pull the trigger Doc?
 

jberryhill

Philadelphia Lawyer
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
12

Dave Zan

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,700
Reaction score
10
As always, the devil is in the details. :disappoin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

Sedo - it.com Premiums

IT.com

Premium Members

MariaBuy

Upcoming events

Our Mods' Businesses

UrlPick.com

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom