- Joined
- Jan 11, 2006
- Messages
- 3,372
- Reaction score
- 349
I have a concern. After reading what is described at this post: http://www.dnforum.com/thread162829.html and it got me thinking. If the accused should be punished if they are found guilty, why is the accuser going unpunished when they post false claims? I vote that a false accuser should be at least warned or temporary banned, and a permanent ban for repeat offenders.
Making false accusations does real harm to a person (and/or companies) reputation and business. It reminds me of back in the 1800's when a group of people would accuse a woman of being a witch and then burn her at the stake. Just because someone is labeling a person as a scam, doesn't make it so. It could be a competitor trying to give them a bad name or someone who just had a misunderstanding.
We either: a) need a better system to handle disputes or b) make it harder to make false accusations by punishing those that do, just like we would punish those who run scams
Making false accusations against an individual is equivalent to slander and it should be treated as such. There is two sides to every story...
Just a thought and something for everyone to think about.
Making false accusations does real harm to a person (and/or companies) reputation and business. It reminds me of back in the 1800's when a group of people would accuse a woman of being a witch and then burn her at the stake. Just because someone is labeling a person as a scam, doesn't make it so. It could be a competitor trying to give them a bad name or someone who just had a misunderstanding.
We either: a) need a better system to handle disputes or b) make it harder to make false accusations by punishing those that do, just like we would punish those who run scams
Making false accusations against an individual is equivalent to slander and it should be treated as such. There is two sides to every story...
Just a thought and something for everyone to think about.
Upvote
0