closed PokerMeister.com

[Dale Hubbard]

Thoughts?

Thanks!

 

[namedropper]

"Meister" is a really weak suffix. I can't imagine someone buying this. $0.

Unless whois is just slow to populate, this isn't even registered. If you didn't register it, don't waste our time by posting it.

 

[Dale Hubbard]

I don't mind your not liking the 'meister', (someone's already disagreed with you elsewhere), but I do object to your calling my integrity into question. Do your whois at Godaddy.com. And please don't bother with any more appraisals for me, it wastes 'our' time also.

 

[namedropper]

People are free to disagree with me, that doesn't mean "meister" is any less weak.

The fact that the name was unregistered and then picked up by you and posted so fast that whois hadn't populated it and had never heard of it shows that the name wasn't a popular one... it sat unregistered. Not being registered and available for anyone who wanted to pay the $8 or whatever is the best appraisal of all.

It does now show you as the owner after the update.... my condolences on the purchase.

 

[namedropper]

And I might add that the other thread talking about blackjackmeister.com has everyone agreeing that the name sucks... and the one person who said he like "meister" admitted he was going to have to brand the name himself.

So the implication that I was out of line here is complete nonsense, as the other thread agrees that this type of name is very, very weak.

You might try taking people's advice to heart instead of lashing out.