Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
Post & Discuss Examples of MISINFO in Domaining!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lifesavings.online" data-source="post: 2305615" data-attributes="member: 322970938"><p>What you need to consider here, are the exact words this claim is made by. I'm going with this link: <a href="https://www.godaddy.com/community/Domain-Aftermarket/GoDaddy-uses-its-Uniregistrar-division-to-front-run-domains-then/td-p/162287" target="_blank">https://www.godaddy.com/community/Domain-Aftermarket/GoDaddy-uses-its-Uniregistrar-division-to-front-run-domains-then/td-p/162287</a> </p><p></p><p>The claim is deceptive, and that's putting it leniently.</p><p></p><p>He tells us blatantly, <em>"I <strong>now</strong> have proof that GoDaddy uses its <strong>Uniregistrar division</strong> to register and buy domains that customers have backordered..."</em> </p><p></p><p>As I argued above, this <u>is a RECENT development, since the merge:</u> His own words suggest such, by saying <strong>now</strong> and explicitly calling out the "partnered" <strong>division</strong>. <u>He has 0 evidence of this happening in the (relative) distant past</u>...Yes, this is NEW. Just happened! BUT hang on, because below, I'll show you, he makes you *THINK* there are distant past cases - with his choice use of an (apparent) lie... </p><p></p><p>"<em>restitution for the <u>domains fraudulently stolen</u>, the </em><u><em>domain name stolen</em>"...</u></p><p> </p><p>There he contradicts himself. It CANT be both. See, he suggests there are 'domains' : an attempt to <strong>nudge</strong> you into perceiving this has been going on <u>for some time!</u> And he isn't talking about 'other peoples' domains...because, he explicitly included them THIRDLY in that same sentence. You can't be naive. I suggest he knows what he's doing : implying that this has been a problem for some time...No. It's new. His own words paint us that conclusion.</p><p></p><p>He doesn't claim to know ANYONE else accusing - yet! Though he is entertaining a <em>judgment</em> for them too. So...maybe nothing, maybe just some fluff... More likely though, if my 'conspiracy theory' is true, there may be other such claims coming up real fast.</p><p></p><p>If it is a conspiracy, the next step is for this to happen to more people. These kinds of people <u>CANT HELP</u> telling you what happens next because they like to sound smart when 'stuff' really does happen...</p><p></p><p>I feel he has <strong>REAL evidence</strong>. I question his integrity. I question the integrity of domaingang.com as well.</p><p></p><p>I reiterate, domaingang called named it a 'conspire'. The poster never wrote 'conspire'. domaingang.com conjured that up. I proved, the claim is not based on a conspiracy. It's based on fraud - his own words. domaingang.com misleading reporting. I'll take that as a clue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lifesavings.online, post: 2305615, member: 322970938"] What you need to consider here, are the exact words this claim is made by. I'm going with this link: [URL]https://www.godaddy.com/community/Domain-Aftermarket/GoDaddy-uses-its-Uniregistrar-division-to-front-run-domains-then/td-p/162287[/URL] The claim is deceptive, and that's putting it leniently. He tells us blatantly, [I]"I [B]now[/B] have proof that GoDaddy uses its [B]Uniregistrar division[/B] to register and buy domains that customers have backordered..."[/I] As I argued above, this [U]is a RECENT development, since the merge:[/U] His own words suggest such, by saying [B]now[/B] and explicitly calling out the "partnered" [B]division[/B]. [U]He has 0 evidence of this happening in the (relative) distant past[/U]...Yes, this is NEW. Just happened! BUT hang on, because below, I'll show you, he makes you *THINK* there are distant past cases - with his choice use of an (apparent) lie... "[I]restitution for the [U]domains fraudulently stolen[/U], the [/I][U][I]domain name stolen[/I]"...[/U] There he contradicts himself. It CANT be both. See, he suggests there are 'domains' : an attempt to [B]nudge[/B] you into perceiving this has been going on [U]for some time![/U] And he isn't talking about 'other peoples' domains...because, he explicitly included them THIRDLY in that same sentence. You can't be naive. I suggest he knows what he's doing : implying that this has been a problem for some time...No. It's new. His own words paint us that conclusion. He doesn't claim to know ANYONE else accusing - yet! Though he is entertaining a [I]judgment[/I] for them too. So...maybe nothing, maybe just some fluff... More likely though, if my 'conspiracy theory' is true, there may be other such claims coming up real fast. If it is a conspiracy, the next step is for this to happen to more people. These kinds of people [U]CANT HELP[/U] telling you what happens next because they like to sound smart when 'stuff' really does happen... I feel he has [B]REAL evidence[/B]. I question his integrity. I question the integrity of domaingang.com as well. I reiterate, domaingang called named it a 'conspire'. The poster never wrote 'conspire'. domaingang.com conjured that up. I proved, the claim is not based on a conspiracy. It's based on fraud - his own words. domaingang.com misleading reporting. I'll take that as a clue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
Post & Discuss Examples of MISINFO in Domaining!
Top
Bottom