It's interesting to see the number of posts each participant in this thread made:
http://www.dnforum.com/misc.php?do=whoposted&t=282032
Nice stats, I guess add one for me.
Getting back to what I had mentioned ealier, it would be nice to have a conversation but we are not seeing that.
Regardless as to who posted what and how many posts were made, it is the reason for the posting, wouldn't you think?
It would be great to be able to come on to a .mobi thread and simply make a comment and move on.
But looking at the overall stats you provided, I see about 10 or 11 of the members that would have a favorable view of .mobi. Those members encompass a grand total of 49 posts. The remaining 84 are simply the ones pointed out as trashing and bashing.
As I say, as soon as a mobi topic comes on the forum, the piranhas swarm.
It is not enough for someone to post a topic of a .mobi. Immediately the negativity started.
My first post was not until post
#44.
So, where are the lines crossed? Obviously, there are no lines. People are free to post whatever and where ever they want. :asleep:
I guess that is good enough for me. I guess I'll start following all the topics and threads and members I care nothing for and chime in my opinion. Gotta love the freedom so why not exercise it. :smilewinkgrin:
As far as threads like this...those that dislike mobi are doing .mobi a great service as far as keeping these threads alive. Most would be surprised how quickly a .mobi thread might die it it were not for all the bashing and trashing.
With that, I can only imagine that the search engines thank the forum members and the forum management thank the forum members. Without the members, threads would die and so would the forum rankings.
And lets not forget that mTLD thanks the forum members, pro and con, for helping to index the .mobi name everytime it is mentioned. Most on this forum were probably unaware of what a spectacular job they are doing to help in branding the .mobi. Memberships on other forums have actually grown thanks to these threads. :yes: