- Joined
- Jul 10, 2002
- Messages
- 4,063
- Reaction score
- 22
not willing to be transparent
Who are you sasquatch?
not willing to be transparent
I know quite a few people who don't privatize their portfolios because they hope to receive an offer on some of their names, but Sahar isn't one of them.
Why does he have to show you anything? Can't you tell by the things he posts that he knows his shit?
If you go to a jazz show at Lincoln Center, do you really need to know what accolades a group received to enjoy the music?
Funny you should say that ......
As Sahar says in his blog:sasquatch said:I already told you the difference. Jazz show will cost me the ticket and a couple of beers. Celebrity domainer blog can potentially ruin me financially, or in the case of a multi-billion dollar company can cost them $300,000 big ones if they are not careful (and opt for a regfee alternative instead :smilewinkgrin:
Who are you sasquatch?
Some of you guys would be successful in this business if you stopped spending your time nit-picking the people who are.
You think Sahar has ever sat down and thought, "Gee I wonder what domains that anonymous Sasquatch guy owns?".
Sasquatch, you're saying that Sahar is anonymous and that we shouldn't pay attention to his blog.
I answered that question many times to attempting "table-turners" like you. Who I am is of no relevance since I am not the one who claims any expertise (except a nose for bullshit), I'm not trying to influence anyone in any financial decisions, and I don't entice anyone (whether directly or indirectly) to buy the by-products of my intellectual or marketing savvy.
Every person that has followers in his line of work, any person that is accepted as someone of great merit in his field, is either fully transparent or to a great degree transparent in his business. And I'd say most of these celebrity domainers are relatively transparent. Except Sahar. Right now I can't think of anyone with a more "prominent public role" in this field, yet surrounded in more business secrecy than him.
Protection isn't always the same as secrecy. The fact that Sahar owns FuneralHomes.com alone should be indicative that he at least grasps the concept of a good domain (566 overture with extension) and a good business plan.
By the way, that quote of Mole's in your signature isn't smart or witty - it's just a faulty metaphor from a member who was self-convinced of his own intelligence. How, specifically, can a sushi roll eat itself?
That comment is proof that you've never done much actual business in this industry. The news flash is that not every domain is for sale.I on the other hand think he has no idea what he's doing since FuneralHome.com has more than twice as much Overture with extension. How's that for smarty tic-tac discussion?
By the way, that is a truly classic postmodern expression which is by its very nature destined to go over the head of the literal translators of your kind.
Here's the bottom line for ya - if you'd invested smartly when you joined up here in 2003 you'd easily be a millionaire by now. Instead, you're just the guy who wasted his time critisizing the industry and the people in it. Next month will be your fourth anniversary of missing the greatest opportunity you ever had. All you have to show for the last four years is being the new Mole.
That comment is proof that you've never done much actual business in this industry. The news flash is that not every domain is for sale.
Yeah, whatever :lol:
Here's the bottom line for ya - if you'd invested smartly when you joined up here in 2003 you'd easily be a millionaire by now. Instead, you're just the guy who wasted his time critisizing the industry and the people in it. Next month will be your fourth anniversary of missing the greatest opportunity you ever had. All you have to show for the last four years is being the new Mole.
That comment is proof that you've never done much actual business in this industry. The news flash is that not every domain is for sale.
Yeah, whatever :lol:
Here's the bottom line for ya - if you'd invested smartly when you joined up here in 2003 you'd easily be a millionaire by now. Instead, you're just the guy who wasted his time critisizing the industry and the people in it. Next month will be your fourth anniversary of missing the greatest opportunity you ever had. All you have to show for the last four years is being the new Mole.
Are you a millionaire?
Are you contributing to this discussion or you felt the need to chime in your worthless comment?Are you a millionaire?
So if someone is selling FuneralHomes.com for $30k and someone else is selling FuneralHome.com for $500k, you'd pick the latter? You really are clueless.Cmon man everything has its price. Every "hard-to-get chick" is a slut inside. Even Rick has "hinted" that he has a "number". The news flash is that not all FuneralHomes.com overture searches are actually meant for Sahar's "baby", but for FuneralHome.com![]()
By saying that I could "easily be millionaire by now" only reinforces what I am talking about this industry all along. No substance, only easy slogans and fluff that gets passed around as wisdom in retrospective.
Being Mole is a noble cause. He is a smart man, and is greatly missed around here.
Nighty night now.
If I had spend less time reading this I could have made another million! LOL!
I was only curious as surely not everyone despite how smart they invested if they started just a few years ago would be millionaires. I suppose I could of just said that surely not everyone who invested fairly well in 2003 is a millionaire by now but Beachie wasn't obligated to answer and he didn't seem to take it near as badly as you did.Are you contributing to this discussion or you felt the need to chime in your worthless comment?
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators