- Joined
- Apr 15, 2002
- Messages
- 5,755
- Reaction score
- 63
Originally posted by Duke of Earl DomainGirl this is the most common mistake I see people make. Google, Yahoo etc. are big because they had the hundreds of thousands of dollars (plus great content) that it takes to brand a made-up name nationwide... Few people seem to understand what a difficult and extremely expensive task this is. I currently work for a company that is trying to do that very thing. We have already spent over a million dollars and we are still light years away from being a well-known name on the internet (even after getting additional free publicity in several national magazines, cable TV networks, etc because of a charity aspect to our project).
If you are going to develop all of your own names for your own little projects that is one thing, but expecting to sell a "brandable" name is something completely different. If a company has ambitions of branding a name nationally and the budget to do it, they will hire a focus group to create their own name. There is no need whatsoever for them to go buy a name from someone else. For the domain name reseller, generic names are indeed the ones that offer the best chance for making sales. Made-up names are almost always losers. My two cents - and good luck to you!
My views exactly, except for major internet firms it takes many millions, far more than hundreds of thousands, perhaps hundreds of millions. Made up names have no value by definition, unless there is a big firm behind the name ready to market it.
I think there is a possibility both videom and shwing may have been mistaken for the real words video and swing by a prospective buyer who made those offers.
Sorry, even during the dot-com boom which peaked early-2000, I can't see the 2 names worth more than a reg fee.