The big mistake that GreatDomains.com and Afternic.com made was that they failed to make prominent the potent names because users had to shift through all the tripe.
The auction has been quite successful because until now people have been able to propose only 2 names per auction. This is one reason why I now support the idea of a small annual subscription charge.
On the other hand, this next auction has *FAR* too many names listed. Im worried now that if this continues, the quality and number of attendees will gradually drop as entries increase and quality of those entries fall.
Cant we just limit each entrant to one domain per auction? At least that way people will be highly selective, it will increase the quality of the auction and attract more buyers.
The auction has been quite successful because until now people have been able to propose only 2 names per auction. This is one reason why I now support the idea of a small annual subscription charge.
On the other hand, this next auction has *FAR* too many names listed. Im worried now that if this continues, the quality and number of attendees will gradually drop as entries increase and quality of those entries fall.
Cant we just limit each entrant to one domain per auction? At least that way people will be highly selective, it will increase the quality of the auction and attract more buyers.
Upvote
0