Originally posted by dmorel
#1 - A system that is first come, first serve is fair.
<soapbox>
A "fair" system is in the eyes of the beholder, just like a "fair" tax system depends on your perspective as a taxpayer. Some on this board would argue the current system is fair as those who really work at it can have a decent chance of getting names they want. I see some merit to those arguments.
"Fairness" aside, here's what I see happening.
The big boys and those who know how to directly work the system will get busy when WLS is approved. At WLS startup time, these players will flood the WLS registry with subscription requests. The other players will be left with table scraps, pretty much like it is today. The only difference is that since the cost of playing will be somewhat higher (the final wholesale cost for a WLS sub vs. the current 6 bucks to reg a name), there may be a somewhat larger selection of table scraps.
Once the WLS is up and running, the big players will be continuously looking ahead for desirable names and their expiration dates. There will be a tradeoff, and maybe some of the smaller fry will get subscriptions on good names that are not due to expire for several years as the big players may not want to commit to several years' worth of WLS subscription money for a name that may or may not drop. Who knows - we will find that out in real time as the great experiment gets underway.
Folks who want to play the domain name game for money, can get names if they do the work and make the investment. That seems clear from the posts by experienced folks here. I am not looking to buy names for financial profit - I follow these threads because I find them immensely interesting, and occasionally try to grab a scuba diving related name that I like. My intent is to eventually stand up some sites for them.
escubadiver.com dropped a while back, and the Hong Kong bunch beat out expirefish for it. Was that fair - depends on your perspective. Could I have gotten it if WLS had been in place? (Is Batman a transvestite? Who knows?) (with apologies to the hilarious movie S.O.B.)
WLS supporters all espouse the belief that WLS will be fairer and will level the playing field. My response is that "fairness" cannot really be measured, and that it is unlikely that the playing field will be levelled in the manner that the supporters hope for. WLS is intended to put money into VeriSnap's pockets, and WLS supporters are naive (in my opinion) to believe that it will significantly benefit the small players.
</soapbox>
BD