on the thread issue..
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:-cCVsAZ-X8kJc.dev.mobi/blog%3Fpage%3D5+nokia+.mobi+default+phone&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=18&gl=us
"But here's the thing. I believe .mobi is about so much more than just small, compliant markup that will reliably work on all handsets. It's also about the context of mobility: it's about a web user inferring that the provider of the site has thought through what he or she, on the move, wants to do on that site. Or to put it another way, with an acid test: if I was on the move, was running Internet Explorer 7 or Firefox 2 on my phone, and I knew that the site I want has both .com and .mobi addresses, which would I choose?"
So, let's say major cities throw a couple of billboards up, some subway ads posted, some radio plugs, the little taxi ads #&*%& boom - the public learns of .mobi - admit it, that's easy enough. ..The real question becomes is it something the public will use (not even if its necessary, needed, useful, better, which market section, age group).
or however small, arguendo, does .mobi have its place for users that come continue to enjoy and come to depend on grasping easy to use, quick access content?
Aesthetics, content, ads - c'mon, that's the easy stuff :uhoh:
I did see Nokia considering a default .mobi today, anyone know if true?>
Also others raised that predictive text could bring in .mobi