- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 4,335
- Reaction score
- 171
I am pretty sure I can say I have seen it all now. Unreal.
This is the biggest reverse domain hijacking i've ever seen..
I am pretty sure I can say I have seen it all now. Unreal.
Frankly I have a feeling Bodog will get the domains back and the other guy will end up paying huge money for the revenue lost due to the domains inactivity.
That just sounds like the logical thing to happen. The whole story is ridiculous.. the guy owns the patent for online gambling I really hope Bodog wins. Otherwise it's bad news for us, if someone can fill a lawsuit, get your domains and get away with it. It might be bad for the domain industry, even though it's not about the domains there.
~MG
I think Bodog will get teh names back too, it is the matter on how he gets it back. But I do not see teh patent holder being penalized at all, and why should he be penalized? The court is the one who made the decision to let this "patent holder" siezed the asset of the domain name.
As far as "getting away with it", a lawsuit was filed and Bodog had an opportunity to defend it, they did not. So it isn't like it was a sneak attack or behind closed doors. It appears Bodog made the concious decision to not respond thinking they couldn't be touched by US courts. I jsut hope they go after the patent and have it cancelled. Or at least try. But as I said before, I'll bet the next casino he goes after will respond (and probably move the domain so it can't be touched).
Interesting... in case of .com domain name, is it sufficient to have it registered with non-U.S. registrar?My advice now would be, "Ignore it and make sure you have no US assets.")
amazing how many typos of newbodog were taken so fast:upset:
Is there a trusted .com registrar which is not located in US.. just in case
~MG
So you are upset someone squatted faster than you squatted???
You have a point, yes they could at least technically.Interesting... in case of .com domain name, is it sufficient to have it registered with non-U.S. registrar?
Verisign registry is U.S.-based anyway and they are technically able to do everything with a domain name, for example transfer it to any U.S.-based registrar and the said registrar may be forced to serve a new owner as per U.S. court decision... or not?
I guess i was ambiguous , I meant it more for responding to domains if challenged in court since we all own .COMs.. Yes, Non-US residents can ignore US lawsuits as long as they have no US assets (.COMs are a US asset) But I guess John said that already .
.COM's an US asset? No way. What says the Philly lawyer? Of course I suggest non US registrars to avoid such trouble.