Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every DNForum feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!
Sedo

Bodog.com is no more!

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheLegendaryJP

Level 9
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
4,335
Reaction score
171
I am pretty sure I can say I have seen it all now. Unreal.
 
Dynadot - Expired Domain Auctions

DNQuest.com

DNF Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
993
Reaction score
1
This is the biggest reverse domain hijacking i've ever seen..

Again, this is not a domain case, it is an asset siezure case. Big difference.

I am pretty sure I can say I have seen it all now. Unreal.


Think of the precedence this sets.....

  • Alleged TM holder goes UDRP on a domain
  • Respondant does NOT respond
  • Alleged TM holder wins UDRP (almost all the time)
  • Alleged TM holder goes ACPA (In hopes the respondant does not respond to lawsuit)
  • Respondant does not respond
  • Alleged TM holder wins default judgement and awarded monetary damages
  • Alleged TM holder goes after all US based domains the domain onwer owns (regardless if it pertains to them or not)

This precedence does set that up senario. Actually, the UDRP could be by-passed alltogether and go straight to ACPA hoping the lawsuit goes unanswered. Then take every domain the domain owner has (depending on the awarded monetary amount). This could be very scary especially if Bodog is unuble to appeal the decision. If Bodog settles this matter and gives the guy money and they do not get teh decision overturned, this could be a new angle for TM holders to go. I can see TM attorneys now advising against UDRP in hopes of getting a bigger payoff at the end.
 

DomainMagnate

Domain Magnate™
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
3,927
Reaction score
29
Frankly I have a feeling Bodog will get the domains back and the other guy will end up paying huge money for the revenue lost due to the domains inactivity.

That just sounds like the logical thing to happen. The whole story is ridiculous.. the guy owns the patent for online gambling :confused: I really hope Bodog wins. Otherwise it's bad news for us, if someone can fill a lawsuit, get your domains and get away with it. It might be bad for the domain industry, even though it's not about the domains there.

~MG
 

GAMEFINEST

PURE SAVAGE
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Messages
3,584
Reaction score
0
Im going to miss bodog.com
 

katherine

Country hopper
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
8,427
Reaction score
1,290
Bottom line:
If you have exposure in the US and fear potential controversy
host outside the US
keep your domains with non-US registrars

No guarantee this will stop Uncle Sam, he's quite good at enforcing US laws abroad actually but this should make things a little bit more difficult for him.
 

DNQuest.com

DNF Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
993
Reaction score
1
Frankly I have a feeling Bodog will get the domains back and the other guy will end up paying huge money for the revenue lost due to the domains inactivity.

That just sounds like the logical thing to happen. The whole story is ridiculous.. the guy owns the patent for online gambling :confused: I really hope Bodog wins. Otherwise it's bad news for us, if someone can fill a lawsuit, get your domains and get away with it. It might be bad for the domain industry, even though it's not about the domains there.

~MG

I think Bodog will get teh names back too, it is the matter on how he gets it back. But I do not see teh patent holder being penalized at all, and why should he be penalized? The court is the one who made the decision to let this "patent holder" siezed the asset of the domain name.

As far as "getting away with it", a lawsuit was filed and Bodog had an opportunity to defend it, they did not. So it isn't like it was a sneak attack or behind closed doors. It appears Bodog made the concious decision to not respond thinking they couldn't be touched by US courts. I jsut hope they go after the patent and have it cancelled. Or at least try. But as I said before, I'll bet the next casino he goes after will respond (and probably move the domain so it can't be touched). :)

i was just thinking, this is like Ron Goldman going after OJ, siezing every asset he can to satisfy a judgement he won against OJ a decade ago. Goldman was recently awarded the rights to his yet unrealeased book. This is the same concept, he has a monetary judgement, he is siezing the asset to satisfy the judgement.
 

DomainMagnate

Domain Magnate™
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
3,927
Reaction score
29
I think Bodog will get teh names back too, it is the matter on how he gets it back. But I do not see teh patent holder being penalized at all, and why should he be penalized? The court is the one who made the decision to let this "patent holder" siezed the asset of the domain name.

As far as "getting away with it", a lawsuit was filed and Bodog had an opportunity to defend it, they did not. So it isn't like it was a sneak attack or behind closed doors. It appears Bodog made the concious decision to not respond thinking they couldn't be touched by US courts. I jsut hope they go after the patent and have it cancelled. Or at least try. But as I said before, I'll bet the next casino he goes after will respond (and probably move the domain so it can't be touched). :)

Can't really argue as I lack the legal knowledge here, but common sense says if Bodog wins and decides to sue back - somebody have to pay for losses and court proceedings.. :)
Anyway it's going to take some time till it gets resolved.

~MG
 

tonyk2000

DNF Member
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
361
Reaction score
1
My advice now would be, "Ignore it and make sure you have no US assets.")
Interesting... in case of .com domain name, is it sufficient to have it registered with non-U.S. registrar?
Verisign registry is U.S.-based anyway and they are technically able to do everything with a domain name, for example transfer it to any U.S.-based registrar and the said registrar may be forced to serve a new owner as per U.S. court decision... or not?
 

nicpal

Level 6
Legacy Gold Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Messages
668
Reaction score
0
That is crazy. I actually got emailed from one of their affiliate reps this morning about joining their program. When I didn't hear back, I tried going to one of the sites and wondered why it was down. Just goes to show you should respond to legal action....it's not gonna go away.

LOL, they just emailed me a Word doc to fill out and said my account would be created by tomorrow evening. I guess they got the main site up, but not the rest of the network.
 

nicpal

Level 6
Legacy Gold Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Messages
668
Reaction score
0
yeah but they have a pretty extensive network of sites which are all still down.... bodogfight.com, bodogaffiliate.com, bodognation.com etc.. I wonder how many domains they took offline in total.
 

ck89102

Level 5
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2006
Messages
482
Reaction score
1
All those domains are up & running with "new" in front of each.

Easy solution for Bodog, or should I say, New Bodog.
 

DNQuest.com

DNF Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
993
Reaction score
1
amazing how many typos of newbodog were taken so fast:upset:

So you are upset someone squatted faster than you squatted???
 

HomerJ

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
1,493
Reaction score
16
edit: deciding to hold my tongue. does anyone else think the timing is a little too ironic? what with the start of football season here ..
 

katherine

Country hopper
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
8,427
Reaction score
1,290
Interesting... in case of .com domain name, is it sufficient to have it registered with non-U.S. registrar?
Verisign registry is U.S.-based anyway and they are technically able to do everything with a domain name, for example transfer it to any U.S.-based registrar and the said registrar may be forced to serve a new owner as per U.S. court decision... or not?
You have a point, yes they could at least technically.
Would be interesting to know if there is any precedent.
 

schepperer

Level 3
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
I guess i was ambiguous , I meant it more for responding to domains if challenged in court since we all own .COMs.. Yes, Non-US residents can ignore US lawsuits as long as they have no US assets (.COMs are a US asset) But I guess John said that already :) .

.COM's an US asset? No way. What says the Philly lawyer? Of course I suggest non US registrars to avoid such trouble.
 

DNQuest.com

DNF Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
993
Reaction score
1
.COM's an US asset? No way. What says the Philly lawyer? Of course I suggest non US registrars to avoid such trouble.

Actually, it is an asset held in the US... That is how it was able to be siezed, argued as an asset, that asset resides in the US.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 7) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

Sedo - it.com Premiums

IT.com

Premium Members

MariaBuy

Upcoming events

New Threads

Our Mods' Businesses

UrlPick.com

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom