- Joined
- Oct 21, 2007
- Messages
- 278
- Reaction score
- 3
If domain owners are bottom feeders, then so are land owners. There isn't much difference owning a piece of land that you hope will get developed or bought one day. Domain names are also similar to land in the fact that you never know which piece is going to sell and when, and for how much.
When I started this was a big risk, and after many years this has been an expensive investment. Many names still are risky.
If people are upset because I had the foresight and ballz to gamble on .ca domain names meaning something one day, then that is just too bad for them. You don't see me crying about having to pay a crazy price for a piece of land that someone bought for hardly nothing many years ago. Especially if it's for business.
No one should ever feel bad for having these domain names. It's just another piece of capital in a capitalist society.
With that said, I do think that CIRA should extend the safety period for people not renewing domain names. 30 days is not a lot, and it would be easy to accidentally lose names. I think they should have a 90 day period between no payment and loss of the domain name. They should issue an email requiring a response. If no response is given, a letter should be sent out.
I'm always afraid that I might screw up and lose a key name. That could be a very expensive mistake. I can see a company that isn't domain literate, or has a lot of names, losing an important name very easily.
When I started this was a big risk, and after many years this has been an expensive investment. Many names still are risky.
If people are upset because I had the foresight and ballz to gamble on .ca domain names meaning something one day, then that is just too bad for them. You don't see me crying about having to pay a crazy price for a piece of land that someone bought for hardly nothing many years ago. Especially if it's for business.
No one should ever feel bad for having these domain names. It's just another piece of capital in a capitalist society.
With that said, I do think that CIRA should extend the safety period for people not renewing domain names. 30 days is not a lot, and it would be easy to accidentally lose names. I think they should have a 90 day period between no payment and loss of the domain name. They should issue an email requiring a response. If no response is given, a letter should be sent out.
I'm always afraid that I might screw up and lose a key name. That could be a very expensive mistake. I can see a company that isn't domain literate, or has a lot of names, losing an important name very easily.