It makes sense: when the deadbeat #1 bidder is removed for non-payment, the subsequent "winners" should have no obligation towards their original bids. That's why NameJet needs to have a 1-strike policy and ban repeat offenders.
What's ridiculous is the fact these members aren't banned. The high bidders subsequently should have no obligation to pay and i don't blame them for not paying.
Kate, what's up with the fuzzy bunny and the Norwegian flag?
I don't get notifications either, but most of the time the domains end up in my active auctions again - if I had participated in the first place, which is the case with all these reports here.
doc, I have a list of the auctions that I participated, someone else won them and then they were repeated as that person didn't make payment. That's how I know, when I am included for a second round of auctions.
And guess what: keywest.net didn't get paid for the 2nd time now! It's back on auction for the 3rd time.
I now saved last 6 days of winners too, now this group round Enom is so dirty I could believe they are bumping on their own (i.e. Snapanmes or Pool I would not believe that but these I would)
It's because they only take wire (over 5k)...and have the strict 7 day pay period. I know I paid for all the ones I won this month, and gladly at that.