- Joined
- Mar 25, 2006
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 0
This thread all seems to add up to having a 'cunning plan'.
I dare say I'm thinking of turning Japanese )
I dare say I'm thinking of turning Japanese )
touchring said:Well, a lot has to do with the willingness to invest in "prime property" in domain names - city and country names.
How many people have lost money investing in "prime property" at the early stage of any new technology?
Lots of people have lost thousands of dollars registering hundreds of almost "randomly generated" .com only to find that they can't sell.
I am not too sure about the legitimacy of this
sale; an idn.net selling for $10,000?! (when I
doubt the .com is even worth $200...).
Methinks a little 'market making' could be at
work here (between buyer and seller) so as to
try and kickstart an aftermarket in idn.com ;-)
Hmm, lets see, who else stands to gain from an
upward trend in idn.com? (oh yes, most of the
IDN speculators here!...). Idn.com's, of EVERY
quality, have usually only ever been sold to other
speculators for $10 to $200 a piece - my question
then is when did idn.com make such a gigantic leap
in value? (when IE7 hasn't even come out yet, and
there have been no further developments in IDN..).
Or are we simply to believe that 'tokyo' is such a
great word that from this point on we should now
a) forget the idn.com sales that have taken place
thus far b) ignore the fact that this is a 2nd place
.net domain (gee, the .com must be worth a fortune
) and c) believe that idn.com somehow has the
edge over idn.idn, when in fact, to date, no such
thing has been proven to be the case.
Richard
richard
Gold Lifetime Member
Last Online: 12-16-2007 02:19 AM
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators