I have a few in Live and a few in Silent. Oddly, several of the ones I agreed to reductions on didn't make it to Live or Silent. I believe many (not all) of the names chosen for each auction were pre-selected as well as a number of domains were categorized under an "if only" column somewhere. "If only" he reduces the reserve, this one will move forward to Silent or Live. Clearly, the criteria used has not been publicly defined and seems all over the board. I doubt it is an automated selection process as well as several of my really good names were not chosen for Live or Silent.
My best names and names with revenue didn't make it in however.
The screening process definitely needs some tweaking.
Not as far as .mobis are concerned, Moniker is doing the right thing here, less other TLD's and more .coms. The only .mobi that made it live is pussy.mobi, if you look at the last Internext auction in February, they had 31 .mobis in live!, what happened 6 months later to make Moniker change? My position is, why contaminate the list with other TLD's when .com remains the dominate TLD?
I was told by a rep at Moniker that having your domains hosted there gives them a leg up on getting listed.
To me - a $9 a year fee should not keep a domain name that could make them $1000+++ from getting on the list - but who am I to argue their formula evidentally works for them - we all want on the list :-/
Raider I agree 100% with you but you missed the point of my post. Lower quality names with high reserves are making it to auction over higher quality names with low reserves. My examples were for .mobi but I've noticed this with other extensions as well (com, net).
There are people that own thousands of names; do you seriously expect them to move them to Moniker just to get fair access to the auction?
There is more than meets the eye, such as the background games that are being played. It happens every time there is one guy in town offering services. The key is to have competition.