- Joined
- Sep 22, 2004
- Messages
- 3,987
- Reaction score
- 16
Me personally I'm going to be the first to register games.tel so all you people need to just step off cause it's mine! LOL
4) Take a look at the models for iPhone and Google's Android - they're optimized to show actual websites on their browsers.
Optimized to show, but not rendering worth a shit.4) Take a look at the models for iPhone and Google's Android - they're optimized to show actual websites on their browsers.
Optimized to show, but not rendering worth a shit.
Slow to load, time consuming as a .com site. Even Apple and AT&T admit it. See the interview on June 28 with Steve Jobs and the CEO from AT&T.
If this, if that, when this, when that...
NEWSFLASH...quit wishing.
Back later.
Keep the bitching going.
Optimized to show, but not rendering worth a shit.
Slow to load, time consuming as a .com site. Even Apple and AT&T admit it. See the interview on June 28 with Steve Jobs and the CEO from AT&T.
Enter dot mobi. Enter Apple and Steve Jobs opening the "closed box" to third party apps.
Enter dot .mobi now being promoted by Apple on Apple's iPhone website for apps.
http://iphoneipodwebapps.blogspot.com/2007/11/aviationmobi.html
http://iphoneapplicationlist.com/?s=.mobi
SportsTap one of the top list of iPhone/iPod Touch apps.
So someone needs to get off their ass and on the phone and put that call in to Steve Jobs.
You know what, I am just as passionate about .com. Love this biz. Love all your input.
I'm here all night so I'll check in later.
Keep the thread going. DNF rankings love it.
I can see your point. But here's the thing. Mobi compliant webs sites work equally well and with rapidity on both the PC and the cell.True. But the seed is planted. Just because something isn't great now doesn't mean it won't be in 6 months.
I'll be damned if I'm going to build a text only website which renders well on cell phones that will all be rendering browsers like our PCs do in a year or two.
Just my opinion.
on any domains.If I had $300,000 to drop it wouldn't be...
I realize the "so-called experts," often get things wrong.
Experts who said dotMobi had zero chance. And after a rocky college career, 6th round pick Tom Brady inevitably no future NFL career. The 1980 Miracle On Ice.
Here is what I don't get, and I am neither a hater of mobi or a big owner I own 3. Why do people who don't own any, do not have any money at risk, rally against the extension.
At $98 a barrel I shorted OIL and covered at $90 decent profit. I had a friend who was short gold I was not angry, Come short my commodity what are you doing, I could care less about Gold because I was not trading it. No money at risk why would I care what he does with his money ? I understand people with a vested interest but unless there is a short .mobi ETF coming out who cares what other people do with their money? IMO
Certain people under the disguise of "constructive criticism" have the motive to make MOBI look bad because they consider MOBI an increasing threat to their already established domain investments and PPC income. They certainly donât want to lose any visitors/income/attention to MOBI and the more a new extension, like .mobi becomes successful, the more it will be the subject of their constant libelous attacks.
Perhaps you need to consult the definition of "libel"; we're having an interpretive disagreement about the prospects of uncertain future events. I'm happy to see people chasing the "next great thing" from .asia to .eu to .mobi, but, at some point, there needs to be a countervailing rational wind that grounds the market in fundamentals and not hype. You can certainly invest however you wish, but there's a difference between short-term gains and the establishment of a viable, long-term market.
.mobi is the biggest pump and dumb scenerio used by a few well known con artists.
Here is what I don't get, and I am neither a hater of mobi or a big owner I own 3. Why do people who don't own any, do not have any money at risk, rally against the extension.
Having nothing invested in it should be a plus in the objectivity realm, but people that are invested in it either don't want to or can't see that.
Turn it around...People who HAVE NOT invested in it can not see it.
I've said it a few times, have at it just please stop posting every little freaking thing like it's some earth shatering breaking news.
And I think it has also been said that if you don't want to read it, don't. If you feel compelled to comment, expect a response.
If I had what I considered good domains in a valuale ext. and I knew there were more out there for the taking, I would keep my pie hole shut as I scooped them up...DONE
Back when I was catching some good names at gdaddy (yes it's true) people were always saying how much their drop service sucked. I just smiled and said "more more more" because they were my competition. Would any of you .mobi guys think it wise of me to have announced here that people should shut up about how gdaddy drop sucks and go get some decent names like o-p.com or Certifier.com or LLL.net's for $12.50. No way.
Been doing that.
Doc Com said:Turn it around...People who HAVE NOT invested in it can not see it.
I think it is okay to be suspicious and I am too.I'm not a hater, or a lover. I'm a skeptic about .mobi
Frankly, the current sales seem to be just way too high for a new extension that the public hardly knows about. Some of the sales are competing against .com and are much much bigger than .net. And these are extensions that the people actually know about. Music.mobi is a great name, but 600k+ (I'm not sure how much it went for, please correct me if I'm wrong) is severely over inflated, and I'm sure even the most ardent mobi lover will agree.
Such inflated sales just make me suspicious. I cannot see any reason why any reasonable investor would put in 600k+ for a domain in an extension that'll take at least 5 years to register into the public mind. 60-80k for Music.mobi would've been digestable, but this is just going way way over the top.