The post is slanderous, full of lies, and more than anything reputation damaging as you can tell, mod Johnn closed the threads in question (another is the first that started the whole issue about a deal on ebay which is not dnf business).
My question is, legally, shouldn't the mods be on top of reputation damaging posts when no evidence exists to corroborate the charges??? And DELETE the posts, not simply close them???
Outraged,
ca11
My question is, legally, shouldn't the mods be on top of reputation damaging posts when no evidence exists to corroborate the charges??? And DELETE the posts, not simply close them???
Outraged,
ca11