Originally posted by bidawinner
Izopod, Feel like arm wrestling today ? :laugh:
I made a pact a long time ago not to arm wrestle the handicapped. It's just not fair. Sorry
On another subject, eddie--- ReRead your own post:
Originally posted by eddie1278
No offense there is a reason why it wasn't reg'd the s makes it bad. e-mail is already plural without and s on it. Do you go to the post office or your mail box to pick up your mail or your mails?lol
Might be able to get $50 for it
I realize you were talking about his other name "e-mails.org", but you didn't stop with the "appraisal" of just the name, you went out of your way to show why "emails" isn't "used". Which
DOES effect the name Nico origally asked to be appraised, "emails.net".
On my part I tried to correct this "misconception" about "emails" (e-mails). How many emails did you get today?? Also click on the link below to see how many newspapers use the word in it's plurarl form
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=emails&btnG=Search+News
Yeah, you're probably right eddie the "putz" comment wasn't called for, but keep in mind that what comes around goes around in those appraisal sections. It's why I've been a ardent supporter of "clean" appraisals without the innuendo's. If it's $50 fine. If you have a legitmate reason why it's just $50, let hear it, but make damn sure you are right.
People do try to sell those names after getting appraisals from us. I think we owe our fellow members that much to "get it right".