The porn industry is something I do not delve into. Yes, names and names only forwarded and parked. Developing sites? No.
The initial thread The sex industry is one area where .mobi could be a gold mine was started by someone who has total disdain and no use whatsoever for .mobi. That's fine.
But I think the key word in that thread title was COULD and I can do nothing but agree.
A study that I read a couple of years ago stated that webmasters, developers, and programmers for porn sites are the highest paid in the computer industry. Their job is to circumvent, avoid, and get around any block or wall set up to stop them from being accessed. That is almost a daily task of writing and re-writing scripts for this. Sorry, I don't know too much about the technical jargon.
When I consider the word PORN and all it implies, I would have to guess that porn is perhaps one of if not the biggest draw these days to the internet.
Taking that concept into consideration along with the simple basic fact that there are an estimated 3.5-4 billion cell phones in use TODAY which is nearly 2 times the number of PC's and laptops along with the studies that indicate that number of cell phones will be 7 billion by the year 2010, it is foolish for anyone to dispute the fact that The sex industry is one area where .mobi COULD be a gold mine.
But this thread is based on the premise that .mobi is dying or is dead and also coming from the crowd that believes the bastard child name .mobi should have been aborted in the fetal stage by ICANN't before it was born.
But this is also the same bunch of MobiPhiles and Schillingites that I laughed at years ago while not a member of any of these forums but used to view some of these forums and same blogs that are so revered by many.
If one person on here owns anything other than a .com then they are committing hypocrisy. And that includes Frank Schilling who owns keywords in nearly every extension and language.
All I am hearing is Dot Com is king and will remain king. I won't argue that.
But there are a great many opportunities out there and missed opportunities that many will perhaps regret.
Time will tell who is right and who is wrong.
But to dispute human nature's desire, obsession, and wanting to view porn on a portable device is absolutely ludicrous to even suggest that no one wants to view porn on a cell phone.
If we take only 1% of the current estimated 4 billion cell phones in use are being used to view porn, nudity, voyeur videos...that is 40 million cell phones. That is just one percent.
That is pretty good numbers and numbers that I would take as a pretty good indication that, yes, The sex industry is one area where .mobi could be a gold mine.
So seriously, why is this even being debated?