To further build on Steve's statement above. The value of domains and the new tld's
is very similar to the cycle of raw land.
As the population expands and prospers, the need for more land is needed.
The .com can be visualized as the downtown property which will alway be in demand if it
is in a prime area.
The .org's can be the suburban area of the city. And, the value is continuing to rise.
And, the .info is the next ring of populated area.
Which, makes the .biz and .us the raw land further away from the city.
And, the secret of the underdeveloped tld's is to determine which direction the
population is moving.
Maybe, the .us land will take a little bit longer to be of major value. However, the land
still has value for agricultural use until it is needed.
The additional point to note is that crappy land will have very little potential for appreciation. And, crappy names are the same thing.
Therefore, my strategy is to buy prime or semi-prime locations within each tld cycles.
However, I don't know where to put .net within this example.
is very similar to the cycle of raw land.
As the population expands and prospers, the need for more land is needed.
The .com can be visualized as the downtown property which will alway be in demand if it
is in a prime area.
The .org's can be the suburban area of the city. And, the value is continuing to rise.
And, the .info is the next ring of populated area.
Which, makes the .biz and .us the raw land further away from the city.
And, the secret of the underdeveloped tld's is to determine which direction the
population is moving.
Maybe, the .us land will take a little bit longer to be of major value. However, the land
still has value for agricultural use until it is needed.
The additional point to note is that crappy land will have very little potential for appreciation. And, crappy names are the same thing.
Therefore, my strategy is to buy prime or semi-prime locations within each tld cycles.
However, I don't know where to put .net within this example.