[M] Mimimise [dot] com - One Word Generic Dictionary Word - Massive!

[AlienGG]

To be clear. I did not hijack his domain. I was stupid enough to use a shady service.

 

[jberryhill]

By accepting the domain push, he agrees to the agreement.

Bullshit.

Did you used to be a legal advisor to kidnappers?

 

[AlienGG]

Bullshit.

Did you used to be a legal advisor to kidnappers?

No matter what. The agreement has been accepted and the domain has been pushed. That's all I have to say.

 

[companyone]

Bullshit.

Did you used to be a legal advisor to kidnappers?

Nice one John... there should be a picture of this guy in the dictionary...next to the word(s): " in denial".

Peace,
Dan

 

[mmkrulz]

Bullshit.

Did you used to be a legal advisor to kidnappers?

Haha, yes, "When you accepted the kids back, you agreed to the following agreement automatically."

 

[AlienGG]

Haha, yes, "When you accepted the kids back, you agreed to the following agreement automatically."

I was not a "kidnapper" whichever you may call it and the agreement was not automatic or implied being accepted. It was accepted manually.

 

[companyone]

No matter what. The agreement has been accepted and the domain has been pushed. That's all I have to say.

You can't even keep your word in this post!

Peace,
Dan

 

[AlienGG]

You can't even keep your word in this post!

Peace,
Dan

I don't know what you mean.

 

[Johnn]

To be clear. I did not hijack his domain. I was stupid enough to use a shady service.

So what is the problem to post the link of this scam services here so other people can avoid?

I think you're done here as I am not too sure who would want to do business with you anymore? May be Adam will have a long term solution for you!

 

[AlienGG]

So what is the problem to post the link of this scam services here so other people can avoid?

I think you're done here as I am not too sure who would want to do business with you anymore? May be Adam will have a long term solution for you!

I believe most people will use it instead of avoiding it.

 

[Mark Talbot]

I have enjoyed this thread considerably since it's early stages.

One thing that comes to mind at the closing, does this 'accepted' agreement fall under the defense of "Genuineness of assent" or not? As I understand it a contract or agreement entered into under duress, fraud, or undue influence, can in effect make the agreement null and void.

 

[AlienGG]

It's not under duress, fraud or undue influence. It was up to Donnacha's own discretion to accept it or not.

 

[mmkrulz]

It's not under duress, fraud or undue influence. It was up to Donnacha's own discretion to accept it or not.

I still don't see how you intend to prove that Donnacha accepted the agreement if someone else went to the site and got the codes without his personal knowledge and just sent to him.

 

[Poohnix]

After following this thread all the time from the beginning, there are still some things I don't get.... This "magical service".. the way it appears to me, not at all unlikely, is that it's controlled by AlienGG, and possibly even created by him.. how is he able to find it if it keeps changing IP, and DNS doesn't resolve, unless he knows it, because it's his?
Is it possible to tie that to him somehow?
And would it be possible to somehow test to see if it does what he says? (But even if it does, he had time to develop it after this started, so it wouldn't prove anything...)

I will probably get some kind of answer from AlienGG, but since his credibility is zero it doesn't matter.

...

 

[AlienGG]

I still don't see how you intend to prove that Donnacha accepted the agreement if someone else went to the site and got the codes without his personal knowledge and just sent to him.

He's the only one had knowledge and access to the link.

After following this thread all the time from the beginning, there are still some things I don't get.... This "magical service".. the way it appears to me, not at all unlikely, is that it's controlled by AlienGG, and possibly even created by him.. how is he able to find it if it keeps changing IP, and DNS doesn't resolve, unless he knows it, because it's his?
Is it possible to tie that to him somehow?
And would it be possible to somehow test to see if it does what he says? (But even if it does, he had time to develop it after this started, so it wouldn't prove anything...)

I will probably get some kind of answer from AlienGG, but since his credibility is zero it doesn't matter.

...

When the IP address changed, I first thought it was down. After a few days and it was still down. So I entered a different IP with subnet changed sequentially to try out, and ultimately it was found again when I hit the right ip.

 

[Johnn]

No one here would listen or believe all the BS from you.

Time for you to pack up and leave and don't need to waster your time any more.

 

[Mark Talbot]

It's not under duress, fraud or undue influence. It was up to Donnacha's own discretion to accept it or not.

If it was a kidnapping, every cop in the world will let you demand to anything you want, but in the end, the cuffs are still going on.

Given an objective, manifestation of mutual assent, the issue remains as to whether the offer or acceptance was subjectively (at a personal level) an act of free will.

If the objective manifestation of mutual assent was not an act of free will, the party to the contract not exercising free will may have the right to rescind (abrogate) that which objectively appeared to be a contract.

In order for Donnacha to retrieve what is rightfully his to begin with, he has to agree to an agreement, which is not of his free will. It is his, and to expect him to sign an agreement, is in essence to coerce him to agree to something in order for him to retreive something which he already owns by law.

 

[AlienGG]

If it was a kidnapping, every cop in the world will let you demand to anything you want, but in the end, the cuffs are still going on.

That's wrong and irrelevant.

In order for Donnacha to retrieve what is rightfully his to begin with, he has to agree to an agreement, which is not of his free will. It is his, and to expect him to sign an agreement, is in essence to coerce him to agree to something in order for him to retreive something which he already owns by law.

It was written by an attorney. I can't explaint it on his behalf.

Look, I'm not trying to be a jerk here. I admit that I used the service with my ignorance and stupidity. I feel bad when it was found not being legit.
I realized Donnacha's frustration when he first contacted me and I was trying to give him the name when I contacted him through Myspace. He emailed me again not only with the original request, but also a C&D. I got pissed by the C&D. Other than that, I was willing to give the name to him from the very beginning.

 

[jberryhill]

It is his, and to expect him to sign an agreement, is in essence to coerce him to agree to something in order for him to retreive something which he already owns by law.

Correct.

Look, I'm not trying to be a jerk here.

Well then lets just call it a natural talent.

 

[VirtualT]

He's the only one had knowledge and access to the link.

Rubbish, the link was posted here by VC, and without realising it I actually quoted him and the link here:

http://www.dnforum.com/showthread.php?p=1208045#post1208045

the link was only actually removed from my post a few hours ago.