The "Domains in Trust" Porn avoidance ploy

[NameBox]

Originally posted by GeorgeK
Just like a turkey cannot fathom what goes on in the minds of eagles, you're one pathetic and uninformed f*ck, NameBox.

This thread is giving you some DNFBucks, at least.

Why don't you tell us 1 domain name you own, NameBox? Soar like an eagle, or be a turkey.

GeorgeK,

Take a deep breath and try to contain your impulses. Read my last post, before you continue to self inflict more damage with your rampant use of profanity.

Quite vile really! Once again, the public demands to know: are you the "real" owner and operator of restricted.com or is it being held in the "domains in trust" department for a "client". If the latter is the case, surely it isn't the wisest thing to have a porn site associated with a financial firm.

Ask yourself:

1. Would George Soro's Quantum Funds have a "Domains in Trust" department?

2. Would Nassim Taleb's Empirica register a domain which is being operated as a porn site on behalf of a client?

3. Would Algorithmics operate a Kara's Playground affiliate program?

Rhetorical questions really, as the answers are "painfully" obvious. Accept some good hearted advice from your friends: its wise to distance oneself if one is only acting as an agent and is not in fact the real beneficial owner of the porn domain. Unless of course ...

Now, be nice and stop using "cuss" words. "*" away all you'd like, but it still doesn't look good on you :sad:

 

[GeorgeK]

Eat sh*t and die, NameBox. After you go f*ck yourself with a rusty coat hanger and broom.

For someone who won't provide a single example of a Domain Name that they own, you sure do have a lot of questions. Too bad I don't have the time, inclination or obligation to give you the answers, for free.

So, go back to the peanut gallery, and be an observer, while others go about their business.

Don't feel obligated to reply.... although, as a "Tireless Rebutter",

http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame21.html

I'm sure you'll do so anyway.

 

[Fearless]

Come on Namebox, spend $9.95 and get a domain name. They're a lot of fun.

 

[GeorgeK]

I'm keen to know who will be the first to own a domain name..... "Jeff Williams" of INEGroup (inside joke, for those who read the ICANN lists) or NameBox.

 

[NamePopper.com]

Hey guys. Have you ever tried frozen 'Snickers'? They are delicious!

Just go get a bag of the 'bite sized' versions - then stick them in your freezer for an hour or two.
PRESTO - you have a scrumptious treat. Crunchy - Cool - Chocolaty - and Refreshing.

They have quickly become my favorite snack.

 

[GeorgeK]

I defer to NameBox's expertise on 'nuts', as I'm sure it exceeds my own.

 

[NameBox]

Originally posted by GeorgeK
Eat sh*t and die, NameBox. After you go f*ck yourself with a rusty coat hanger and broom.

For someone who won't provide a single example of a Domain Name that they own, you sure do have a lot of questions. Too bad I don't have the time, inclination or obligation to give you the answers, for free.

So, go back to the peanut gallery, and be an observer, while others go about their business.

Don't feel obligated to reply.... although, as a "Tireless Rebutter",

http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame21.html

I'm sure you'll do so anyway.

Nice language. Quite a vulgar tongue you've got there Champ. Would MamaK be proud of this utterance (or restricted.com for that matter).

Word to the wise, you've placed the proverbial gun to your head, and self inflicted a credibility shattering wound. Thank goodness that many have taken screen shots and saved your statement for perpetuity! The gaffaws will last for years!

Put that statement on the back of your business card GeorgeK, and tell your "clients" that they'll get excellent service from someone who thinks nothing of slandering others, and rolling in the gutter of the profane. I'm sure many will be impressed, especially when you explain to them that you blew a gasket due to the Revelation that restricted.com = whois in GeorgeK's ownership = a Porn site!!!

Originally posted by GeorgeK

So, go back to the peanut gallery, and be an observer, while others go about their business.

[/B]

Would that be the business of operating porn sites and Kara's playground affiliates. Come on Champion of Integrity, answer up, are you or are you not the "real" owner and operator of the porn site restricted.com.

We're all waiting. Pornographer or not? A simple question which demands a simple answer. YES or NO?

If not, then why take "credit" as the owner?

Once again, I counsel that you get a grip and calm yourself and remember:

"Those who resort to profanity only reveal the bankruptcy of their argument!"

Hubris is thy name GeorgeK!

Cheers and a Good Weekend to all!

 

[GeorgeK]

haha Run away. Come back another day, when you have a domain to tell us about.

 

[NameBox]

Originally posted by gregr
Come on Namebox, spend $9.95 and get a domain name. They're a lot of fun.

So I hear, especially the one's which infringe on other's trademarks. Pete Rozell must be spinning in this grave at the lost opportunity at crushing litigation!

GregR, you NameBox doens't pay retail.

Has you anti-vulgarity and vile profanity moderation function been disabled? Or do you want these forums to be havens for slanderers and profanity spewers.

I guess if they swear fealty for "your fearless leader" then all bets are off. GregR, word to the wise, no one needs vassals who defame these forums by resorting to language of the gutter.

Doesn't look good on the Moderators or the Owner!

Cheers

 

[GeorgeK]

Namebox: folks who cuss at the likes of you are only enhancing their reputation.

 

[NameBox]

Originally posted by GeorgeK
haha Run away. Come back another day, when you have a domain to tell us about.

Question to GeorgeK,

1. Are you the owner of the porn site "restricted.com"

if yes:

2. How do you reconcile this with:

(i) Your earlier statements intimating that you are holding it for a "client".

(ii) Your holier than though ye other pornographers attitude.

(iii) The somewhat varied business interests in which you engage in under the same moniker. A true multi-faceted conglomeration of interests, from the sacred to the profance!

if no:

2.

(i) Why haven't you made a simple statement to that effect and continue to evade the question.

(ii) Why not include the "clients" name in the whois record. They certainly would want their ownership of such a "valuable" property on record would they not?

3. Didn't MamaK threaten to wash your mouth out with soap or make you eat pepper if you used "cuss" words? Haven't you learned that swearing in such a vile manner only brings disrepute upon oneself.

Cheers

 

[GeorgeK]

lol NameBox. What makes you think I have an obligation to answer any of your questions?

I know I'm the centre of your world, but come on. What's in it for me? Your love?

 

[GeorgeK]

By the way, I've got no holier than thou attitude towards the adult domains industry. I've said in the past it's entirely legitimate. Yahoo, eBay, Amazon.com, and many other legitimate firms have a portion of their revenues from adult content.

 

[NameBox]

Originally posted by GeorgeK
Namebox: folks who cuss at the likes of you are only enhancing their reputation.

Really. I'm sure your 'clients" would be thrilled at your turn of phrase. Much back slapping would ensue, and the Board would no doubt congratulate itself at hiring a vulgar, profane spewer of bile, who continues to evade the question of:

Do you or do you not own and operate the Porn Site restricted.com?

Just check the box below!

Yes [ ]
No [ ]

Well, we're all waiting? Simple Question mandates a Simple Answer!

Cheers

 

[GeorgeK]

The world would love to know the colour of Britney's undies, but she need not answer the questions from the peanut gallery.

 

[Fearless]

I notice stark differences between GeorgeK and Namebox.

On one hand we have GeorgeK, Mr. Accessible, he squeezes every possible way he can be reached in his posts. He lays out all his cards for everyone to see. He must have nothing to hide. He also needs his mouth washed out with soap.

And then we have Namebox (NB), Mr. Mystery or Miss Mystery, NB has no contact information whatsoever. NB puts his website down as php.net, might be, but I doubt it. NB signs up for an account here using an email address from an email service. NB comes here and makes posts criticizing my websites and GeorgeK's websites. We can't say, well your websites suck too.
We can't say, well look what you're putting on your whois.

Give us something NB, anything. What attracts you to this forum? Do you have anything to do with domain names?

 

[NameBox]

Originally posted by GeorgeK
lol NameBox. What makes you think I have an obligation to answer any of your questions?

Sadly GeorgeK, you don't seem to realize that not answering the question:

Do you or do you not own and operate the porn site restricted.com

... is, in fact, in and of itself an answer. Most people, when confronted with such a question, and intimating that they did NOT own and operate the domain, would not HESITATE to state categorically NO .. I am NOT a pornographer!

Originally posted by GeorgeK

I know I'm the centre of your world, but come on. What's in it for me? Your love? [/B]

For one who professes to be a champion of integrity and transparency, the respect and admiration of the members of these forums, who want to "believe", should be reward enough for coming clean.

Sadly, answers will not, I very much fear, be readily forthcoming. We can expect the restricted.com whois record to change quietly, and the plausible deniability to commence forthwith!

Cheers

 

[GeorgeK]

haha The WHOIS won't change. It's entirely accurate, and in compliance with ICANN rules. Legal adult content is at that site, too. If anyone wants to sell me Sex.com, me and my clients might be interested, at the right price.

My banking clients would be happy that my company doesn't discriminate against legal enterprises, either. More $$$ = good for you, as long as it's legal.

 

[NamePopper.com]

Sometimes when the store doesn't have the bite-sized Snickers - I buy the regular size versions. Then I put them on a plate - and slice them into thin pieces. Then I spread out the pieces in a single layer on the plate - and put the whole plate in the freezer for an hour or two. The end result is fantastic & quite tasty!

 

[GeorgeK]

Putting nuts into the freezer is a very noble cause, NamePopper. Although, be careful about eating them later -- some nuts might cause you to vomit.