- Joined
- Feb 21, 2004
- Messages
- 1,174
- Reaction score
- 4
For the last few days, a domain of mine shows "estimated" click rate at .26 a click. The domain recieved 22 clicks for the day. The following day the "estimate" was finalized at .11 a click. Though my clicks weren't determined to be fraudulent at all, my rpc was messed with.
I'm willing to give all the monetization services, including Parked.com, the benefit of the doubt that advertisers pay differing amounts per keyword. Additionally, all the visitors aren't clicking on the very same keyword every time, so the average rpc amount gets tough to estimate, .26 for that click, .03 for that click, .07 for that click, etc.
So heres what I propose, why can't Parked.com use 24 hour estimates, or 30 day estimates (though I'd prefer 24 hour estimates, since they are less subject to price swings, in the case of poker keywords the last 30 days averages are trailing downwards, so day 1 might be paying .25 a click, wheres day 30 is paying .05 per click. In that case it'd be better to use 24 hour average, since if the advertisers paid .05 a click yesterday, that'd be better to show as the "estimated" rpc for today, then .25 a click, what was paid 30 days ago. Showing us .25 a click for our estimate, then seeing .05 being actually finalized, thats whats ticking us off, because .05 is 80% down from .25) so that are estimates are more approximate. If you know what the advertisers paid yesterday, then why can't we use that as todays estimate? What has happened in the last 24 hours, that poker keyword advertisers are now paying .04 today instead of the .05 yesterday? But don't tell us were earning .25 a click (like we did 30 days ago), when were really only earning .05.
And why do we need an average anyway? Why can't Parked.com use 24 hour known paid rpc numbers, to estimate todays earnings. But do it, not as an average, but as a total. So say, our domain had 3 clicks, 1 @ .40, 1 @ .20, and 1 @ .06, for a total of .66 revenue earned. Don't show our "estimated rpc" as .40, or a random number such as .26, show it as a more realistic, total earnings (0.66) divided by 3 clicks, or .22. Allow this number to change in realtime, so that an hour later, after our domain gets a 4th click, for .06, our total revenue for the day is now 0.72 divided by 4, equals .18. Our average rpc has gone down, but thats ok, because our total revenue has gone up, from .66 to .72. This tells us we got a .06 click in that last hour.
We are willing to accept "estimated" rpc, were just asking, can't that number be closer to accurate rpc (based on current numbers, not .25 when its .05) in realtime, then all be shocked first thing the next day when 80% of our portfolio evaporated, and thinking about moving all our domains to namedrive!
Just my 10 cents.
dnjackal, It's actually kind of funny that you brought this up. Even though I am responding a little late. Our system works very similiar to this, almost identical to this. If a domain comes in for the first time today, we obviously can't estimate based on historical information. So we either take the past 24 hour average of your account if it's available or the past 24 hour average of the terms that people are clicking on. Now I have thought of one improvement based on country which we don't estimate based on country today, just clicks, but you did basically hit the nail on the head on how our system works. If you have a domain with a lot of traffic we are better at estimating the next days numbers than a domain that doesn't have any clicks in the past. I know like Namedrive just does their x cents per click on an estimate and then changes it once the numbers are finalized, but I think both system are good.
Donny
My joke about 1112, is because he has been with Parked for almost a year now and I probably talk to him about once a week whenever the domain on one of his domains drops. He is a good guy and I everytime it's the same question.Humor? if the issue is Parked is not paying for any clicks or taking clicks away, is that classified as humor? Imagine the other parking companies, your competition, getting a laugh out of this post and thread.
I'm not sure why Monte didn't respond to you, it could be because he was waiting for me to come back into the office, I'm not sure. But he definitely should have sent you something. But it seems like you removed all of your domains from your account anyway.You indeed may be missing something. It's called customer service. 4 days since I emailed Monty and no response.
I'm not here to stroke anyone or try to get any particular business. And I'm definitely not here to blast any of my competitors, if I was there would be a post "why not to use xxxx". Every parking company does things there own way, and every parking company can make certain domains money. We are all playing with the same information, it's just what we do with this information.Coming onto the forum and performing a nice stroke job to get the business of the core customer base and then lamblasting anything contrary to your concieved notion or business model is not advisable to keep a customer and build trust and a business relationship.
I was being civil for a long time. I clearly stated on multiple occasions that they were estimates and we were working on ways to always make them more accurate. I was on vacation during this whole fiasco, so I was doing my best to try and understand the issues that were happening. Most of the problems were mainly because most of you were new to our system and how we estimate revenue for the current day. If you go back and look at Namedrive they had this same issue when new people starting using their system for the first time. If I remember correctly, you have been using Sedo which pays on their estimate, not on what is earned. We pay based on what is earned.Many of us recently came to parked in good faith after having issues elsewhere. To present a display such as this when one questions a system one is not familiar with is pure unprofessional and irrational.
My suggestion would be more transparency and a civil tone when addressing customer issues. But if that is not your style then so be it.
I never said that you were running a bot, I never said that about anybody on here. There is somebody, maybe one of our competitors, maybe somebody else, that has a bot running that is hitting thousands of domains a day across thousands of accounts. We are counting them as being clicks, but Yahoo isn't because they can tell it's a bot. I've already gotten 4 responses from Yahoo on the situation and they are supposed to be sending me a way to detect it today, because so far I have not been able to easily detect the bot. So this is what I have mentioned about a bot, once I figure it out they will be stopped at the front door and no longer be able to get in.And if you suspect or think for a moment that any of my domains are sending traffic via bots or spiders, guess again.
Hope this helps to explain some things.
Donny