Duck,
If Yahoo tells me to shut somebody down for whatever reason do you think they are going to pay us? No. If I don't get paid then the affiliate/partner doesn't get paid.
If I find fraud, I contact Yahoo and tell them I found fraud and I tell them to refund the money to the advertiser, because I shouldn't make money because somebody is cheating.
If somebody is cheating us for 3 months, and I find out today, and I've already paid them then it would be hard for me to go after them even if Yahoo doesn't pay us. But in this case the ex-affiliate/partner loses out one pay period, I may lose our 3 months depending on how things happen. The advertisers could possibly get back 3 months worth, so who is really screwed here?
Donny
Donny,
In short, Yes I absolutely think and expect that they not only would pay you but are legally obligated to pay you. This isn't the wild west. Yahoo doesn't get to make up rules arbitrarily and keep money that other have already earned.
If verifiable fraud is the issue, then I totally understand. But if conversion rate is the reason, that's a different story. Neither you nor Yahoo have the right to change the rules retroactively. I don't know your TOS with yahoo, but if they did not stipulate a necessary conversion rate, I find it difficult to believe they would be able to withhold money retroactively based on a new rule. If I advertise with the Los Angeles Times, I cannot refuse to pay them for last months ad simply because I am unhappy with the results. The same is true for your customers. If they did nothing illegal or against the TOS, you can't simply refuse to pay them based on the results for clicks that have already occured.
Again, verifiable fraud is a different story. But in this thread and others I have seen you argue low conversion rate as the only reason for withholding funds. I'm not against you personally, I simply cannot understand how you or Yahoo could do that legally unless it was a part of your TOS.
This is not my fight but I do feel a need to defend reasonable process. If a parking company told me that they were withholding my last 30 days revenue simply because they weren't happy with my conversion rate, I would argue it is them who is commiting the fraud, not me. If Yahoo is telling you that they are withholding your revenue because they aren't happy with the results, they had darn well better have that in their TOS or you have a very legitimate lawsuit available to you. Companies can't just change rules retroactively and keep money that is already owed.